The real reason the Clinton's want gun control?

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts: 6712
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

The real reason the Clinton's want gun control?

Post by Paladin »

While I'm sure the Clinton's didn't go down there themselves and steal the manuscript, the fact that it was the only thing taken is a red flag. Could it be the Clinton's want gun control because civilian ownership of firearms increases the hazards to their minions?


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/staticarti ... 57498.html
Kathleen Willey: Clintons stole my manuscript
House burglary over weekend targeted copy of book days after details leaked to press


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 5, 2007
7:00 p.m. Eastern


By Art Moore
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Kathleen Willey, the woman who says Bill Clinton groped her in the Oval Office, claims she was the target of an unusual house burglary over the weekend that nabbed a manuscript for her upcoming book, which promises explosive revelations that could damage Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

Willey told WND little else was taken from her rural Virginia home as she slept alone upstairs – electronics and jewelry were left behind – and she believes the Clintons were behind it.

The break-in, she said, reminded her of the widely reported incident 10 years ago in which she claimed she was threatened near the same Richmond-area home by a stranger just two days before she was to testify against President Clinton in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

The theft of the manuscript early Saturday morning was suspicious, she told WND, coming only days after the first mainstream media mention of her upcoming book, which is expected to include accusations of campaign finance violations and new revelations about harassment and threats by the Clintons and their associates.

"Here we go again; it's the same thing that happened before," Willey told WND. "They want you to know they were there. And they got what they wanted. They pretty much managed to terrorize me again. It scared me to death. It's an awful feeling to know you're sound asleep upstairs and someone is downstairs."

The book, "Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton" by World Ahead Publishing, WND Books' partner, is due for release in November. Willey said the stolen manuscript was not the book's final copy.

Among its revelations is Willey's identification of the person who threatened her just prior to her testimony against President Clinton – a man who turned out to be linked to the Clintons.

Willey believes the break-in and theft were prompted by teasers of the book's contents published last week in U.S. News and World Report's "Washington Whispers" column and the New York Daily News.

Willey said she is writing the book because of persistent misunderstanding about what happened 10 years ago.

"There is so much misinformation out there, and I had been so badly maligned in the press," she said. "I had the opportunity to set the record straight.

"And frankly," she added, "Hillary Clinton is running for president, and it's a story a lot of people should hear."

Willey points out her story was deemed credible by the FBI, Independent Counsel Ken Starr and CBS "60 Minutes" producers who allowed her to recount it in front of 29 million viewers.

Longtime Clinton lawyer David Kendall was not available for immediate response to Willey's new claims, and Sen. Clinton's presidential campaign has not responded.

Anne Reynolds, crime analyst for the Powhatan County Sheriff's Department, told WND she could only confirm, due to department restrictions, that there was a break-in and entry reported Saturday in the vicinity of Willey's address and that an officer responded and turned the case over to the criminal investigations department.

Willey said she has spoken with an investigator.

Summer of '97

Willey's name became known in the summer of 1997 after lawyers for Clinton accuser Paula Jones gave her name to a national magazine reporter. The lawyers had filed a lawsuit in federal court against President Clinton for sexual harassment of their client and were looking for other women who claimed similar abuse. Willey was subpoenaed by Jones' attorneys to be deposed in their case, and after many months of unsuccessful legal maneuvering, she was forced to testify.

During the months that led up to her testimony, however, she was courted by the White House and the president's attorneys to avoid testifying and then to "plead the fifth" if she was forced to take the stand.

Two days before her testimony, she was approached at dawn by a stranger while walking in her neighborhood. The man threatened her and her children, and references were made to her damaged car and missing 13-year-old pet. The message, she said, was clear: Remain silent.

Willey, nevertheless, told her story of alleged assault by the president and later became a cooperating witness before Starr's grand jury.

She was scheduled to become one of only three witnesses in the Clinton impeachment trial until some members of the House and Senate refused to allow her to testify.

In his deposition in the Jones case, Clinton acknowledged he met with Willey but "emphatically" denied her account, saying, "It did not happen ... there was nothing sexual about it."

Willey, a volunteer in Clinton's White House at the time of the 1993 encounter, said she came to the president to ask for a paying job because her husband, Ed Willey, was facing legal and financial problems.

Ed Willey killed himself on the day of the meeting, although neither his wife nor Clinton were aware at the time.

'Very Nixonian'

Willey believes the break-in last weekend was made to appear as a petty burglary, calling it 'very Nixonian, very amateurish."

"I think they wanted to make it look that way," she said. "Their clear purpose was to find the manuscript."

She points out her house is on a gravel road in the middle of 10 acres.

"I'm very remote, way out in country," she said. "You have to work hard to find me."

She went to bed Friday night upstairs, alone in her two-story home, and the next day discovered her purse was missing and someone had been in her house.

Officers from the Powhatan Sheriff's Department arrived Saturday, and she reported missing her purse, along with cash, a checkbook and credit cards. The intruder apparently came in through a window and left quietly. She said she had heard her dogs bark during the night but didn't think the disturbance was unusual.

After the officers left, she discovered the manuscript was missing from the desk of her first-floor study. Apparently, she said, someone had tried to get into her laptop computer, which, she noted, could easily have been taken but was left behind. She usually leaves her laptop running but found it had been turned off. Also her car was keyed, the antenna broken and her DirecTV satellite system was "messed with."

She spoke by telephone with a friend, a former private investigator, who advised her to look in the woods around her house. There she found her purse, with the credit cards inside and only the cash, a small amount, missing.

She said she recently had used her new computer printer to produce a copy of the manuscript for editing purposes and inadvertently printed two copies.

Apparently, she said, the intruder eventually discovered the hard copy of the manuscript and had no need for the computer.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
Rex B
Senior Member
Posts: 3616
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

dog

Post by Rex B »

The lady needs to get a dog.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
chewy555
Senior Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: dog

Post by chewy555 »

Rex B wrote:The lady needs to get a dog.
The story said that she said that she heard her dogs bark during the night but didn't think the disturbance was unusal.
H&K USP 45
Taurus Tracker .357
Taurus 1911
User avatar
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts: 6712
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: dog

Post by Paladin »

chewy555 wrote:
Rex B wrote:The lady needs to get a dog.
The story said that she said that she heard her dogs bark during the night but didn't think the disturbance was unusal.
In that case she needs an alarm system and a bigger dog :lol:

It's rather disappointing that the MSM isn't covering this. I hope the FBI is investigating the break-in.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Mithras61
Senior Member
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Somewhere in Texas

Re: dog

Post by Mithras61 »

Paladin wrote:
chewy555 wrote:
Rex B wrote:The lady needs to get a dog.
The story said that she said that she heard her dogs bark during the night but didn't think the disturbance was unusal.
In that case she needs an alarm system and a bigger dog :lol:

It's rather disappointing that the MSM isn't covering this. I hope the FBI is investigating the break-in.
Or maybe she needs to get a clue. ;-)

If my dog barks at night, I investigate.

If her dogs bark so much that it isn't an unusual occurence, they need training. Dogs that bark all the time are useless as guard dogs or intruder alarms, not to mention annoying.
TX Rancher
Senior Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:19 am
Location: Fayette Co

Post by TX Rancher »

I don't like the Clinton's either, but where in the article does this tie into "The real reason the Clinton's want gun control".

Did I just miss it???
User avatar
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts: 6712
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Post by Paladin »

TX Rancher wrote:I don't like the Clinton's either, but where in the article does this tie into "The real reason the Clinton's want gun control".

Did I just miss it???
My first few lines discuss it. As powerful people the Clintons don't want the little folks constraining what they do. Civilian ownership of firearms is a constraint to the powerful. If Ms. Willey had had a weapon when she was groped, threatened, or had her house broken into... that could have been a real problem for Bill Clinton or his 'associates' that do his dirty work.

Can you imagine if someone in the employment of the Clintons was shot and killed breaking into Ms. Willey's house?

Can you imagine if someone in the employment of the Clintons was shot and killed while threatening a political enemy of the Clintons?

Can you imagine if a lady had shot and killed Bill Clinton while he sexually assaulted them?

It's a possible reason why the Clintons support gun control
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Post by nitrogen »

I love reading how politicians supposedly support gun control as a means of "keeping the people down".; I think it's nuts.
Hanlon's Razor wrote: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity [or ignorance.]
I think most anti-gun politicians actually, truly believe gun control can work. It wouldn't be the first time a politician based a policy on poor information, and it won't be the last.

(Granted, there are some like Carolyn McCarthy who take these things personally, but I still believe they are in the minority.)

Also, I believe that worldnetdaily is a cyber-fishwrap.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike the Clintons (and I say this as someone that generally liked Bill) than to dig in the barrel for scraps.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous
Xander
Senior Member
Posts: 766
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
Location: Plano
Contact:

Post by Xander »

He he. To go completely off on a tangent, I don't know how seriously I can take someone after they have used the phrase "very Nixonian." That just tickles me. :grin:
Last edited by Xander on Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JRG
Senior Member
Posts: 1049
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Waxahachie, TX

Post by JRG »

Anyone that votes for Hillary should have their head examined!!!

:twisted:

Joe
User avatar
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Post by stevie_d_64 »

Paladin wrote:
TX Rancher wrote:I don't like the Clinton's either, but where in the article does this tie into "The real reason the Clinton's want gun control".

Did I just miss it???
My first few lines discuss it. As powerful people the Clintons don't want the little folks constraining what they do. Civilian ownership of firearms is a constraint to the powerful. If Ms. Willey had had a weapon when she was groped, threatened, or had her house broken into... that could have been a real problem for Bill Clinton or his 'associates' that do his dirty work.

Can you imagine if someone in the employment of the Clintons was shot and killed breaking into Ms. Willey's house?

Can you imagine if someone in the employment of the Clintons was shot and killed while threatening a political enemy of the Clintons?

Can you imagine if a lady had shot and killed Bill Clinton while he sexually assaulted them?

It's a possible reason why the Clintons support gun control
There is nothing new in this...

If they had been caught, shot, killed, whatever...It would have spelled the end of that presidential campaign...

I for one am committed to doing what I can to avoid hearing on January 20th, 2009...

"Madam President"...

Nothing against women at all, a woman president is inevitable...Just not this woman...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Post by stevie_d_64 »

JRG wrote:Anyone that votes for Hillary should have their head examined!!!

:twisted:

Joe
To confirm what??? ;-) :lol:
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts: 6712
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Post by Paladin »

nitrogen wrote:I think most anti-gun politicians actually, truly believe gun control can work.
I'm sure some anti-gun politicians do believe gun control can work. But the smarter politicians are more savvy than that. To them gun control is more about power.

This is a nice example:

http://www.jpfo.org/NaziLawEnglish.htm
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
tallmike
Senior Member
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 10:46 pm
Location: Kyle, TX

Post by tallmike »

Are you actually saying that you believe the clintons hired someone to go into this womans home to steal a copy of a manuscript that isnt even the only or final copy? It didnt slow down the release of the book in any way and it only serves to advertise for her. Now that the accusation is out there more people will want to read "the book that the clintons dont want anyone to see"



What would they gain? Nothing except getting this woman in the news to bad mouth them.


What would they lose? Everything, if they actually hired someone to do it.
Venus Pax
Senior Member
Posts: 3147
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: SE Texas

Post by Venus Pax »

tallmike wrote:Are you actually saying that you believe the clintons hired someone to go into this womans home to steal a copy of a manuscript that isnt even the only or final copy? It didnt slow down the release of the book in any way and it only serves to advertise for her. Now that the accusation is out there more people will want to read "the book that the clintons dont want anyone to see"



What would they gain? Nothing except getting this woman in the news to bad mouth them.


What would they lose? Everything, if they actually hired someone to do it.
If they are behind this, it's more to intimidate her than to steal her manuscript.
ETA: I have never been burglarized, but have only heard stories from people that have. They say it affected them mentally for a very long time.
"If a man breaks in your house, he ain't there for iced tea." Mom & Dad.

The NRA & TSRA are a bargain; they're much cheaper than the cold, dead hands experience.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”