Raisins
Supreme Court Decision Makes It Harder for Government to Take Personal Property From Americans
https://www.dailysignal.com/2015/06/22/ ... -americans
Raisins (SCOTUS CASE: Takings Clause of 5th Amendment & Govt "Taking" Personal Properrty without paying compensation)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Raisins (SCOTUS CASE: Takings Clause of 5th Amendment & Govt "Taking" Personal Properrty without paying compensation
I wasn't sure which place to post this, so I posted n off topic, but it may fit better in another area.
Re: Raisins (SCOTUS CASE: Takings Clause of 5th Amendment & Govt "Taking" Personal Properrty without paying compensation
Looks like this decision should be a good basis for challenging government confiscation of bump stocks, normal capacity magazines and other firearm related things owned by the people. That is, if you could actually get SCOTUS to hear a 2nd Amendment case.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
Re: Raisins (SCOTUS CASE: Takings Clause of 5th Amendment & Govt "Taking" Personal Properrty without paying compensation
Very interesting. It kinda makes one wonder what else this might be applied to. Besides what bblhd672 mentioned.
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
Re: Raisins (SCOTUS CASE: Takings Clause of 5th Amendment & Govt "Taking" Personal Properrty without paying compensation
A good result indeed, but one from 2015.