I have it in my archives; I'll try to find and post it.txinvestigator wrote:I'd like to read the Federal Law. Does anyone remember the number or have a link?
Chas.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
http://www.gunlaws.com/Gun_Free_School_Zones_Act.pdftxinvestigator wrote:I'd like to read the Federal Law. Does anyone remember the number or have a link?
Thanksllwatson wrote:http://www.gunlaws.com/Gun_Free_School_Zones_Act.pdftxinvestigator wrote:I'd like to read the Federal Law. Does anyone remember the number or have a link?
Title 18, Chapter 44, Section 922(q)txinvestigator wrote:I'd like to read the Federal Law. Does anyone remember the number or have a link?
So, if I understand correctly, if you are driving down the Interstate in another state with reciprocity with Texas, and you pass within 1000 feet of a schools property, you are in violation of Federal law? This makes any reciprocity near worthless for interstate travel if you want to be sure and not be in violation. You almost certainly will pass within 1000 feet of a school on a trip of any distance, especially if you get off the Interstate system.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct. As for as Texas law is concerned, you can carry in your car without a CHL, even if you are within 1,000 feet of a school. Federal law however prohibits this conduct, unless you have a CHL issued by the state in which the school is located. (This means reciprocity agreements don't protect you from the federal statute, when we are in other states.)
Technically, yes. But if anyone were convicted under those conditions, and appealed, the U.S. Supreme Court would strike down the law. The feds know that and have chosen to prosecute only clear-cut criminal cases, like criminals entering school buildings with weapons.GrillKing wrote:So, if I understand correctly, if you are driving down the Interstate in another state with reciprocity with Texas, and you pass within 1000 feet of a schools property, you are in violation of Federal law?
From the Act itself: It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.seamusTX wrote:Technically, yes. But if anyone were convicted under those conditions, and appealed, the U.S. Supreme Court would strike down the law. The feds know that and have chosen to prosecute only clear-cut criminal cases, like criminals entering school buildings with weapons.GrillKing wrote:So, if I understand correctly, if you are driving down the Interstate in another state with reciprocity with Texas, and you pass within 1000 feet of a schools property, you are in violation of Federal law?
- Jim
That is generally true for interstates, but for local roads, drivers encounter school zone signs when approaching schools. Some cities even put up specific "drug and gun free zone" signs.GrillKing wrote:"reasonable cause" may be the 'out' for the traveler.... I don't know where schools are when I travel until I come across them. By then, I'm getting farther away from the school.
Good PointseamusTX wrote: That is generally true for interstates, but for local roads, drivers encounter school zone signs when approaching schools. Some cities even put up specific "drug and gun free zone" signs.
Better Point!!seamusTX wrote:
This law is nonsense and a disgrace to the Congress and President that passed it.