I know this is the thought process behind this statement, but I have to disagree with it. I have seen cases in the news where the relative came in at night and was shot and the DA called it a tragic accident. The DA looked at it as "Was the shooting justified?" and not "Was the victim related?"Skiprr wrote:I think the point is that if you shoot in the dark without verifying your target, and it turns out to be a bad shoot (you hit your visiting mother-in-law, or the perennially drunken neighbor who's always getting houses mixed up), the "it was an accident; I couldn't see who it was because it was dark" excuse ain't gonna hold water.anygunanywhere wrote:Under what justification would you go to jail for shooting someone in the dark without a flashlight?
I think this is as much of a myth as the don't use reloads myth. At least in Texas, I would think there is no court case proving this warning to be valid.