Major portions of NFA Ruled unconstitutional

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 1535
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Major portions of NFA Ruled unconstitutional

Post by rtschl »

This only apply to the plaintiffs, members, and their customers.

A federal judge has ruled that major portions of the National Firearms Act are unconstitutional after Congress eliminated certain taxes on suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and other covered firearms.

The judge said Congress itself undermined the NFA through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. By reducing the transfer and making tax on most covered firearms to $0, Congress eliminated the Taxing Clause basis for the law, and courts can't substitute the Commerce Clause instead.

The judge permanently blocked enforcement of the challenged NFA provisions only against the plaintiffs, their members, and their customers. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. CASA, he refused to issue a nationwide injunction or broader declaratory relief.


https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2085056990405865743
Ron
NRA Member
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”