tuckable vs not
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
tuckable vs not
I'm shopping for an IWB holster (1911). I'm looking at the Andrews MacDaniel II (or the SouthFork Razorback, which looks like the same design), but I'm wondering about the pros/cons of this type of holster vs a
tuckable holster.
I realize the tuckable could be slower to draw from, but I'm wondering about comfort and concealability.
Can anyone recommend a good tuckable?
thanks.
tuckable holster.
I realize the tuckable could be slower to draw from, but I'm wondering about comfort and concealability.
Can anyone recommend a good tuckable?
thanks.
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
Re: tuckable vs not
Any tuckable can still be worn as a standard IWB. Having the option of tucking your shirt in over it and not needing any other cover garment is well worth it in the Texas heat, IMO.ghostrider wrote:I realize the tuckable could be slower to draw from, but I'm wondering about comfort and concealability.
Can anyone recommend a good tuckable?
For a 1911, look at something like the North Woods Versatile; all that extra leather there distributes the weight extremely well, and spreads the bulge for better concealment. The only problem I've had with mine was that the clips gave out after a few months of heavy use, but a strip of brass, some Brass Black, and a little work made a set that should last for years.
Definitely get a good belt too; since I got my Wilderness 5-stitch, I wouldn't even think about carrying IWB with anything less.
Re: tuckable vs not
ghostrider - Regardless of your choice, I would suggest get the body shield [sweat guard] option. They are more comfortable because they keep the gun from digging into your side.
As for a suggestion, the Milt Sparks VMII is one of the best leather holsters around. It converts between IWB and Tuckable. It's well made and very comfortable. The only problem is that they are on the expensive side and the lead-time is long. If you want one go to the TopGun website and sign up and they will email you when they are in stock. If you are lucky enough to order one within a couple hours of the email you can get one fairly quickly. That's how I got mine.
As for a suggestion, the Milt Sparks VMII is one of the best leather holsters around. It converts between IWB and Tuckable. It's well made and very comfortable. The only problem is that they are on the expensive side and the lead-time is long. If you want one go to the TopGun website and sign up and they will email you when they are in stock. If you are lucky enough to order one within a couple hours of the email you can get one fairly quickly. That's how I got mine.
Last edited by WildBill on Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NRA Endowment Member
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: tuckable vs not
I occasionally use Comp-Tac's C-Tac as a tuckable for my 1911s. They work very well and are much faster to draw from than any other's. I rarely use it as a tuckable because I can usually wear an untucked shirt, but it nice to have the option.
I also have about 4 different Sparks VM-II's that I never find myself using any longer. They are great holsters and are very well made, but the Comp-Tacs are much faster. (I also believe they are cooler in the summer, but that may be just my impression.) Although I bought tuckable clips for the VM-IIs, I simply can't make them work. Here is a description I posted on another forum in April of 2003:
I also have about 4 different Sparks VM-II's that I never find myself using any longer. They are great holsters and are very well made, but the Comp-Tacs are much faster. (I also believe they are cooler in the summer, but that may be just my impression.) Although I bought tuckable clips for the VM-IIs, I simply can't make them work. Here is a description I posted on another forum in April of 2003:
Okay guys, I need some help. I love my VM2 with the belt loops, so I decided to give the Kydex clips another chance. (They've been in the dead holster drawer for over a year now.)
I finally got the holster on the pants by putting it on before I put the pants on. Getting the shirt tucked was a real hoot; I looked like my 200# sister-in-law trying to get into pantyhose small enough for her 14 year old 90# daughter. My wife was laughing so hard she couldn't breathe and I think I even saw the dogs snickering! Grabbing the shirt with my left hand through on open fly and with my right hand stuck in the back of my pants and working it back and forth like dental floss must have been too much for them to bear. If this is the normal procedure, I'd better get all of the serious bathroom work done before leaving the house.
There has to be a better way. How do you guys do it?
Thanks,
Chas.
Re: tuckable vs not
I'll have to admit that I haven't tried the Kydex clips yet, just the belt loops. I do have a Comp-Tac OWB and it does draw very quickly and smoothly. I haven't had my CHL long enough to carry during a Texas summer yet. 

NRA Endowment Member
Re: tuckable vs not
What guns are they for? I bet some of us would be happy to help you clean out the holster drawer and let you recover some percentage of your lossCharles L. Cotton wrote:I also have about 4 different Sparks VM-II's that I never find myself using any longer. They are great holsters and are very well made, but the Comp-Tacs are much faster.

Re: tuckable vs not
I was thinking the same thing!KD5NRH wrote:What guns are they for? I bet some of us would be happy to help you clean out the holster drawer and let you recover some percentage of your lossCharles L. Cotton wrote:I also have about 4 different Sparks VM-II's that I never find myself using any longer. They are great holsters and are very well made, but the Comp-Tacs are much faster.

"Upon the conduct of each depends the fate of all." - Alexander the Great
Re: tuckable vs not
I have first dibs on all retired holsters for PSC Women's class. Sorry Guys. 

Women on the DRAW – drill, revise, attain, win
Coached Practice Sessions for Women
Coached Practice Sessions for Women
Re: tuckable vs not
Not fair!CompVest wrote:I have first dibs on all retired holsters for PSC Women's class. Sorry Guys.

NRA Endowment Member
Re: tuckable vs not
If I wear a dress, wig and high heels and attend your class, can I get in on the holster deal?CompVest wrote:I have first dibs on all retired holsters for PSC Women's class. Sorry Guys.

Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Re: tuckable vs not
Keith - If you do that I'LL give you MY holster!!!Keith B wrote:If I wear a dress, wig and high heels and attend your class, can I get in on the holster deal?CompVest wrote:I have first dibs on all retired holsters for PSC Women's class. Sorry Guys.

NRA Endowment Member
Re: tuckable vs not
As tempting as that is Biil, I'm afraid if the ladies saw ME coming into PSC in a dress, they may all open fire at once IN MY DIRECTION!!
I guess I better stay clear and wear my normal attire.
In seriousness, I have been looking at getting a tuckable, but not sure if I would use it that much. Since I carry a smaller weapon (PM9) I can either pocket carry if wearing a polo ot use the Kangaroo and don't need the tuckable feature, but it might be a nice option. I may have to try out the Comp-Tac C-Tac and see how I like it.
EDIT: ghostrider, if I was carrying a 1911, I think I would go for the C-Tac. I have heard and seen nothing but good things from the users.
I guess I better stay clear and wear my normal attire.

In seriousness, I have been looking at getting a tuckable, but not sure if I would use it that much. Since I carry a smaller weapon (PM9) I can either pocket carry if wearing a polo ot use the Kangaroo and don't need the tuckable feature, but it might be a nice option. I may have to try out the Comp-Tac C-Tac and see how I like it.
EDIT: ghostrider, if I was carrying a 1911, I think I would go for the C-Tac. I have heard and seen nothing but good things from the users.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member
Psalm 82:3-4
Re: tuckable vs not
It's not a dress... it's a KILT!Keith B wrote:If I wear a dress, wig and high heels and attend your class, can I get in on the holster deal?CompVest wrote:I have first dibs on all retired holsters for PSC Women's class. Sorry Guys.
Re: tuckable vs not
FWIW, my wife attended the class last Saturday, and nobody there was dressed like that.Keith B wrote:If I wear a dress, wig and high heels and attend your class, can I get in on the holster deal?
-
- Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:43 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
Re: tuckable vs not
I have a Tucker Gunleather "The Answer" which I'm wearing right now. It tucks well and holds my Glock very close to the body. I usually wear Jeans and a tucked heavy tee shirt. I don't have any problem concealing at 4:00. Even my wife and kids don't know when I'm carrying with it tucked.
My only complaint is most of my Wranglers jeans ride high as does the holster, so the butt of the slide has made close friends with my lower ribs near the base of the right lat.
IMHO the holster is perfect for lower rise pants.
My only complaint is most of my Wranglers jeans ride high as does the holster, so the butt of the slide has made close friends with my lower ribs near the base of the right lat.
IMHO the holster is perfect for lower rise pants.
Glock 23, Glock 27, Sig P226