What about 30.02(a)(1)? He enters without effective consent, and commits assault (22.01(a)(3) if not any other, especially if the actor is male and the victim female) in the process, making it burglary and opening up the deadly force can of worms.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Perhaps the Utah employer needs to learn of the new Texas "Castle Doctrine." Is pushing past someone entering "unlawfully and with force?"Pushing is certainly "with force" and if the homeowner said anything to indicate the salesman wasn't to enter, then .
As long as the person blocking him is inside the house, then 30.02(b)(1) would clarify that only part of him needs to enter to qualify and some part will have to in order to use force.
As to castle doctrine, I don't see how the walls of a private residence wouldn't count as notice under 30.05(b)(2)(B), (enclosure obviously designed to exclude intruders) making the entry unlawful, and "with force" has already been covered.