 
   
   
   
   
  
Moderator: carlson1
 
   
   
   
   
  
Cost of litigation vs. cost of hiring a full time cop with a gun.flintknapper wrote:Trump said he would have advised against allowing teachers to arm themselves, if only because of liability concerns. In the long run, it could have been cheaper and safer to hire security or off-duty police, he said.
I guess I'm at a loss to understand this statement. Maybe I'm just "thick", but since the teachers are already on the payroll (and assuming they are not being compensated to carry) how could it be "cheaper" to hire security personnel or off-duty police?
Somebody help me here.
Is he assuming there will be a litigation down the road if teachers carry, but not if security does?
Fixed it for ya.Iggy Pop wrote:Cost of litigation vs. cost of hiring a full time cop with a gun + the same litigation.flintknapper wrote:Trump said he would have advised against allowing teachers to arm themselves, if only because of liability concerns. In the long run, it could have been cheaper and safer to hire security or off-duty police, he said.
I guess I'm at a loss to understand this statement. Maybe I'm just "thick", but since the teachers are already on the payroll (and assuming they are not being compensated to carry) how could it be "cheaper" to hire security personnel or off-duty police?
Somebody help me here.
Is he assuming there will be a litigation down the road if teachers carry, but not if security does?

Yes, with written authorization from the school.lunchbox wrote:Is this all legall???
 to the ones in this town that had the guts to stand up for what they believe in and what is our right.....and my
  to the ones in this town that had the guts to stand up for what they believe in and what is our right.....and my   to the Great State of
  to the Great State of  
 
   
   
  