Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
Moderator: carlson1
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide." The Monument Builders, Ayn Rand (1962)
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for things like this to happen.TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
- jbirds1210
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I don't get this. You are either safe.....or you are dangerous. Does it really have anything to do with the gun? I am not trying to offend, but I refuse to let a .30 cent plastic safety device be the deciding factor on where or when bullets flyLiberty wrote:You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for things like this to happen.TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.

NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for people to defend themselves, too.Liberty wrote:You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for things like this to happen.TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
Yes, I carry a Glock. It has never shot anyone, because its owner follows the rules of gun safety religiously. I'm so used to giving a mini safety speech to my sons every time I hand them an unloaded firearm, that I found myself doing the same thing to my Uncle when I showed him my unloaded Glock over the Thanksgiving holiday. My Uncle taught me how to shoot and the rules of gun safety. I guess his lessons stuck!
Remember, in a life-or-death situation, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Barre
Barre
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I don't know which 30 cent piece of plastic you refer to. Probably the manual safety. While believe manual safetys are a good idea. I was mostly thinking about a design that requires the operator to pull the trigger to disassemble. It sounds stupid to me.jbirds1210 wrote:I don't get this. You are either safe.....or you are dangerous. Does it really have anything to do with the gun? I am not trying to offend, but I refuse to let a .30 cent plastic safety device be the deciding factor on where or when bullets flyLiberty wrote:You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for things like this to happen.TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
I can't deny that those who practice good safety habits, won't cause accidents, the problem is every one thinks they are safe, and Glocks just seem to be involved with this type of thing more often than any other gun. In one week we have a cop shooting himself cleaning his Glock , and a football player shooting himself while trying to catch his Glock sliding down his pantleg. While carelessness was the most prevalent factor here, the fact is these types of accidents wouldn't happen with a traditional manual/safety DA/SA or 1911.
I don't mean to paint Glock owners with a broad brush. Most that I know are very safe, and are every bit as responsible as any 1911 owner.

Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
- flb_78
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:17 am
- Location: Gravel Switch, KY
- Contact:
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I have to pull the trigger on my Taurus to tear it down. I don't find a fault in that. I find a fault in the fact that one who is supposed to have superior training in the handling of firearms shot himself.
http://www.AmarilloGunOwners.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
But why would one assume that a cop would have superior training in firearms than most CHLs... I dare say that most hand gun enthusiast practice more and shoot better than the average LEO that doesn't shoot as a hobby.flb_78 wrote:I have to pull the trigger on my Taurus to tear it down. I don't find a fault in that. I find a fault in the fact that one who is supposed to have superior training in the handling of firearms shot himself.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
- stevie_d_64
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
Ok,TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
I see another nominee for the funny post of the year award...
Do I have a second?
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I suppose you found some humor in my mistake. Therefore, allow me to correct my post as I do not desire to win by a simple omission. I would expect a higher standard for such a prestigious award.stevie_d_64 wrote:Ok,TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
I see another nominee for the funny post of the year award...
Do I have a second?

Glocks don't shoot people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
"There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide." The Monument Builders, Ayn Rand (1962)
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:42 am
- Location: Pearland, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I bet you made him proud. I sometimes take my teenage nephew to the range with me, and we always talk safety on the way to the range and while on the firing line. He made a mistake once when one of my 1911s stovepiped, and he turned toward me with the gun and asked what to do. He got a good reaming.barres wrote:Liberty wrote:TacShot wrote: My Uncle taught me how to shoot and the rules of gun safety. I guess his lessons stuck!

Theres room for all Gods creatures. Right between the corn and taters!
15 Dec Applied online
Plastic in hand 30 Apr
Kimber Stainles Ultra Carry II
Colt Defender
M1991A-1 Series 80
Yep. I like .45s
Join and support the NRA today!
15 Dec Applied online
Plastic in hand 30 Apr
Kimber Stainles Ultra Carry II
Colt Defender
M1991A-1 Series 80
Yep. I like .45s
Join and support the NRA today!
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
Gee... Do you think that that could possibly be because Glocks are one of, if not the, most popular handguns on the market and in the home in America today? If there are more of them in use, then there will, statistically speaking, be more of them mis-used, as well. As we so often say when confronting the Brady bunch, "Don't blame the tool for what some idiot did with it."Liberty wrote:I can't deny that those who practice good safety habits, won't cause accidents, the problem is every one thinks they are safe, and Glocks just seem to be involved with this type of thing more often than any other gun.
Remember, in a life-or-death situation, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Barre
Barre
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
The safety on my Glock 27 works fine. It is my primary carry.
I DON'T STICK MY FINGER IN THE TRIGGER. <Safety On>
I STICK MY FINGER IN THE TRIGGER WHEN I WANT TO SHOOT> <Safety Off>
A Glock is not a problematic weapon.
I DON'T STICK MY FINGER IN THE TRIGGER. <Safety On>
I STICK MY FINGER IN THE TRIGGER WHEN I WANT TO SHOOT> <Safety Off>
A Glock is not a problematic weapon.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5322
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
I would bet there is one time you put your finger in the trigger on a Glock when you do not want to shoot.
While a lot of people do not like the lack of exterior safeties on the Glock other than the trigger safety, I do not think this is really a problem. After all, the first basic rule of safety about the finger and the trigger takes 95% of the problem away. A lot of officers were taught on their revolvers to reholster it with one hand and without looking at the weapon. The idea being you would need to put the gun away while you were still watching the suspect, maybe even using one hand to control him. If you do this with a Glock and with a thumbbreak holster (like most cops wore for years), it is easy for the flap sticking up to get caught in the trigger guard and cause a discharge. During the early switch over to Glocks from revolvers, this did cause them to get a bad reputation with some people. It still causes some problems but most of us have since learned how to do this safely.
BUT, there is, IMHO, a major flaw with the Glock design. The Glock is one of those few pistols that require the trigger to be pulled for the weapon to be field stripped. This is when most people have to put their finger on the trigger when they have no intention to shoot. This is how a lot of problems can occur. And I freely admit that it still requires a mistake on the aprt of the operator to have a discharge, but it seems to be setting one up a lot easier. If you have properly unloaded and cleared the weapon before starting disassembly, there is not a problem. But I also know that more people are hurt accidentally with "unloaded" guns than with loaded ones.
Between these two situations, I am sometimes more surprised that there are not more ND's than I am when one does occur, especially among cops.
While a lot of people do not like the lack of exterior safeties on the Glock other than the trigger safety, I do not think this is really a problem. After all, the first basic rule of safety about the finger and the trigger takes 95% of the problem away. A lot of officers were taught on their revolvers to reholster it with one hand and without looking at the weapon. The idea being you would need to put the gun away while you were still watching the suspect, maybe even using one hand to control him. If you do this with a Glock and with a thumbbreak holster (like most cops wore for years), it is easy for the flap sticking up to get caught in the trigger guard and cause a discharge. During the early switch over to Glocks from revolvers, this did cause them to get a bad reputation with some people. It still causes some problems but most of us have since learned how to do this safely.
BUT, there is, IMHO, a major flaw with the Glock design. The Glock is one of those few pistols that require the trigger to be pulled for the weapon to be field stripped. This is when most people have to put their finger on the trigger when they have no intention to shoot. This is how a lot of problems can occur. And I freely admit that it still requires a mistake on the aprt of the operator to have a discharge, but it seems to be setting one up a lot easier. If you have properly unloaded and cleared the weapon before starting disassembly, there is not a problem. But I also know that more people are hurt accidentally with "unloaded" guns than with loaded ones.
Between these two situations, I am sometimes more surprised that there are not more ND's than I am when one does occur, especially among cops.
Steve Rothstein
Re: Did they even need to say that it was a GLOCK?
Unfortunately, it sometimes is the deciding factor.jbirds1210 wrote:I don't get this. You are either safe.....or you are dangerous. Does it really have anything to do with the gun? I am not trying to offend, but I refuse to let a .30 cent plastic safety device be the deciding factor on where or when bullets flyLiberty wrote:You got to admit though that some guns just make it easier for things like this to happen.TacShot wrote:GLOCKS don't people! People shoot people, sometimes themselves.
