My father is in many members of this forums' peer groups being in his late 50s. As I have become a young adult, I have started to realize his tendency to go against the grain with most situations in life. It seems if it is the less traveled road, he is full boar with that no matter if it is slightly unconventional to highly unconventional.
The reason I mention this is because he has had his CHL for about 5 or so years now and even helped cover the state's portion of my app. So as I started carrying, we talked more about the issue. He is minimalist while carrying most of the time carrying along just the Ruger LCP. But my concern comes from a general lack of respect for standing laws against CHL holders and some naive thinking patterns. I have a much younger step brother who is the star high school football star and even though we all know that it is a huge no no to carry at a school or school oriented event, he has admitted to carrying to these games. Same goes for a seen 30.06 or 51% signs.
The naivety comes in with his argument for such behavior. "If I had to shoot someone, I think the DA would side with me with a psychopath killing scores of people!" I try to tell him what are the chances of something happening like that vs. a confrontation that is much more common and low key (mugging, road rage, etc. where more questions on the situation arise and justification is less obvious) or the even easier scenario of just being made in a place he shouldn't be carrying and convicted.
30.06 has gobs of plausible deniability as most know you have to refuse to leave to get convicted. But a 51% or a school? Thats some serious consequences, especially a school situation. I honestly have tried to find a way to appeal to some rationality in this sense, but he listens to too much Alex Jones to take off his tin foil hat on some things. I have a bug out bag in case I had to get out of dodge, but he has 2 bug out bags and a High Point Carbine with 250 rounds in the water proof lock compartment of his truck.... Being prepared is one thing, but he is tending to lean towards the extremes on these issues and it worries me because I would rather not see my father live out a portion of his latter years behind bars because he doesn't want to adhere to some laws he doesn't see eye to eye with.
So how do you deal with the minority of CHL holders that go through the process, but slack on adhering to the responsibility to abide by the laws set forth for us even if they are poor laws ("laws only effect the law abiding" etc.)? I think there are more than we would like to know like this as this forum is a small segment of responsible CHL holders and many just get the plastic and don't think past that. I guess if push comes to shove, he would just have to face the music and face permanent CHL revocation and a possible rap sheet
