Read this... a real shocker in Ohio

DaveT · Post by **DaveT** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:19 am

Shocking case against a CHL holder in Ohio....

http://www.ohioccw.org/index.php?option ... &Itemid=83

longtooth · Post by **longtooth** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:54 am

Prime example of why the carry laws need to be simple in wording so that any 8th grader can read it & understand it. That way everyone could understand it except Montgomery county DA & maybe another we won't refer to.

Roger Howard · Post by **Roger Howard** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:33 pm

I was reading Ohio's local laws and they are screwed up. In Cincinatti it's illegal to own any type of SEMI-AUTOMATIC fire arm. Any one who owns one must render it useless. I go to Ohio all the time and the Dept. of Transportation there see big trucks as rolling ATM's. I know of several drivers who were ticketed for speeding for doing 56mph in a 55mph zone. Yes, 1mph over. States like this only show how much we need a federal law protecting our right to carry.

Diode · Post by **Diode** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:24 am

longtooth wrote:Prime example of why the carry laws need to be simple in wording so that any 8th grader can read it & understand it. That way everyone could understand it except Montgomery county DA & maybe another we won't refer to.

Eeekkk What's up with the Monkey county DA? I assume I have missed something or events before my arrival? Hook me up with a link LT!

1TallTXn · Post by **1TallTXn** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:34 am

Roger Howard wrote:States like this only show how much we need a federal law protecting our right to carry.

Isn't that already in place and called the 2nd Amendment?

Diode · Post by **Diode** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:38 am

1TallTXn wrote:
Roger Howard wrote:States like this only show how much we need a federal law protecting our right to carry.
Isn't that already in place and called the 2nd Amendment?

Isn't that the Truth.

flintknapper · Post by **flintknapper** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:04 pm

1TallTXn wrote:
Roger Howard wrote:States like this only show how much we need a federal law protecting our right to carry.
Isn't that already in place and called the 2nd Amendment?

Yes Sir!

Photoman · Post by **Photoman** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:07 pm

As far as I can tell....it ain't worth doodly squat until the SC rules that the 2nd says what you and I know what it says.

longtooth · Post by **longtooth** » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:36 pm

Diode, I am sorry. I had a brain cramp I guess. I meant Harris county & just let my fingers walk on the keyboard where my brain had not been.

Roger Howard · Post by **Roger Howard** » Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:47 pm

flintknapper wrote:
1TallTXn wrote:
Roger Howard wrote:States like this only show how much we need a federal law protecting our right to carry.
Isn't that already in place and called the 2nd Amendment?

Yes Sir!

Guess what I should have said is that we need the feds to control the states abuse of our 2nd amendment rights. I spoken with LEO's in several states and they all agree that gun laws need to be uniform all across the country.

glock75 · Post by **glock75** » Sun Jun 18, 2006 9:22 am

I wouldn't get to worked up over this one. As usual there is more to the story than the newspaper reports. This guy has a history of brushes with the local law.

http://72.240.42.74/connection/court/lo ... &is=sayers

How he has a CCW is unknown.