Sec. 2.02. EXCEPTION. (a) An exception to an offense in this code is so labeled by the phrase: "It is an exception to the application of . . . ."
(b) The prosecuting attorney must negate the existence of an exception in the accusation charging commission of the offense and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant or defendant's conduct does not fall within the exception.
(c) This section does not affect exceptions applicable to offenses enacted prior to the effective date of this code.
Sec. 2.03. DEFENSE. (a) A defense to prosecution for an offense in this code is so labeled by the phrase: "It is a defense to prosecution . . . ."
(b) The prosecuting attorney is not required to negate the existence of a defense in the accusation charging commission of the offense.
(c) The issue of the existence of a defense is not submitted to the jury unless evidence is admitted supporting the defense.
(d) If the issue of the existence of a defense is submitted to the jury, the court shall charge that a reasonable doubt on the issue requires that the defendant be acquitted.
(e) A ground of defense in a penal law that is not plainly labeled in accordance with this chapter has the procedural and evidentiary consequences of a defense.
New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
Here's what the Texas Penal Code says.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
Re: New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
"Traveling" only seems to be an exemption to the application of PC46.02 (carrying a weapon), not PC46.03 (places where weapons prohibited...i.e. schools). Also, "traveling" is not defined in the statute PC46.15, so I believe it is defined by case law. I would definitely not carry a handgun in a school building (premises) with or without a CHL.quoheleth wrote:You are traveling - that is, you are going from A to B with the school as a temporary stop inbetween, i.e., picking up Lil' Johnnie.I would be in violation for carrying on school property CHL or not if I'm correct
If you were going to school to meet with the teacher for Lil' Johnnie's behavior, then the school is your destination.
I seem to recall this being something a CHL classmate was trying to explain, and the instructor was nodding in agreement. But, I was trying to listen to the other instructor's answer of another question (tag-team teachers are sometimes a blessing, sometimes not-so-much).
Walking through the parking lot is legal with a CHL as long a school sponsored event is not taking place in the parking lot...drill team, JROTC?
My understanding is that the legal status is the same as it has been for several years. Unless the city/county/state owned property meets some specific criteria... a court, jail, polling place on election day, ... It is legal for a CHL holder to enter with a firearm, signs to the contrary notwithstanding.To another point, thanks for the link to the new legislative guidelines. I was wondering about that just this afternoon.
Question: what's the current status of entering while armed properties owned/managed by city, county, and state: i.e., Harris County Public Library, a city community center, or something to that effect? My local HCPL branch still has the ghostbusters sign in the window. Is that legit - not because of the sign, but because it's a county facility?
Thanks,
Q
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
Yes I understand that. My point was that having a defense to prosecution is not the same as having a get out of jail free card. If there is no sign, you now have a defense viz "I didn't know" / "I couldn't know". The decision to create this defense indicates that when signs are missing the patron will no longer be presumed to be completely at fault. Having and using this defense may mitigate the patron’s punishment, but it would seem to me that there is no implied intention that from now on the prosecution itself is going to be skipped. If they had decided to no longer prosecute these cases no new defense would be needed right? This looks to me like the old "Beat the rap, take the ride" situation where even if you "win" you still lose. To me a defense provides mitigation but not absolution. However I will readily concede that the Law that I know is not the law of this land, which is why I usually give these hypothetical legal threads a bit of a berth. Lesson learnt.ScottDLS wrote:Carrying a handgun with a CHL was only a Defense to Prosecution until the law changed in '97. If you have a defense to prosecution, presumably your prosecution will be unsuccessful. The defense is that the bar didn't post a sign, not that you knew/or should have known that it was off limits.Carrots wrote:To me It means that you now have a defense to a prosecution, NOT that you can't/won't be prosecuted. If the place should be posted 51% and you know that it should then carrying there is a choice for you to make. Having a defense to a prosecution is nice, but from a practical point of view whether you have this new defense or not if you are caught you can still be prosecuted and if you are then you will be having a bad day regardless. Just MO of course.
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
You did note that if you are parked and not moving the vehicle, it is legal? I don't see any problem with that.Dexdahex wrote:I guess we be hiring more LEO's to watch for that cellphone use...what's next...no driving in the school zoneI need my CHL now...Doh can't carry in a school zone or use my phone, what if it's in my hand, are they going to check to see if I was texting, Hmmm will they need a warrant ? or do they issue a ticket
I get it I must be concealed
Btw good info
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
- Dexdahex
- Senior Member
- Posts: 247
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 4:07 am
- Location: Harris County Cypress Texas
Re: New traffic, criminal effective Sept. 1
I"m talking about when you need to call them ,due to they are not where they a suppose to be...teenagers, and of course they will text you back verse calling ...now only if i can get text to work via bluetoothPurplehood wrote:You did note that if you are parked and not moving the vehicle, it is legal? I don't see any problem with that.Dexdahex wrote:I guess we be hiring more LEO's to watch for that cellphone use...what's next...no driving in the school zoneI need my CHL now...Doh can't carry in a school zone or use my phone, what if it's in my hand, are they going to check to see if I was texting, Hmmm will they need a warrant ? or do they issue a ticket
I get it I must be concealed
Btw good info

"Every Citizen Shall Have The Right To Keep And Bear Arms In The Lawful Defense Of Himself Or The State"
CHL Holder
NRA Member
Fabrique Nationale Herstal (FNH) FN-40
CHL Holder
NRA Member
Fabrique Nationale Herstal (FNH) FN-40