http://kd5nrh.blogspot.com/2009/10/revolver-reload.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sorry about the lighting; my wife was already in bed, and I didn't want to make too much noise getting lights set up.

Moderator: carlson1
Actually, it's hard to see from that angle, but my right hand never leaves the grip: my left only catches the front of the frame and barrel to help turn the gun up more, and index itself to the ejector rod. The right hand has some control of the gun at all times, (though it does loosen up during the push up and eject - still, if I removed the left hand at any point, the gun would not fall) and the only part of the reload it performs is the cylinder release and pushing the cylinder out with the trigger finger.srothstein wrote:You are switching the gun to you weak hand while you punch out the expended rounds (and putting the strong hand underneath to catch them).
In practice, I tend to be bringing the gun back to eye level as the speedloader drops and I close the cylinder, so my usual finish from that reload is in firing position at roughly the same time my left hand gets onto the grip.joe817 wrote:From the time you began your speed load, to returning to the low ready position took 3 seconds according to my chronograph, if that's any help. To me that's pretty quick. Is a reload on an auto any quicker??
I see your point, and well taken. I'm sure that is critical(with a semi-auto) in a competition shoot, but in a real life situation I'm not sure I could remember the number of rounds I have fired, before remembering that one is left in the chamber before I have to reload...if it reaches that point. I pray to God that I never reach that point.With a practice, one can get faster with an auto. OTOH, it's more important to be fast with a a revolver, since the gun is completely out of commission while the cylinder is open, while most autos (the ones without a mag disconnect) can still fire once during the reload if needed.
I wouldn't even try to count rounds during an active encounter; the idea of keeping it ready is for when you don't have a target at the moment, but want to switch to a full mag in case things pick up again. It's also part of why I don't like the "tactical reload" or "reload with retention:" I'd rather drop the partial mag to the ground in favor of getting the fresh mag in as soon as humanly possible, and if the lull lasts long enough, (and I still want it badly enough) then I can pick up the partial and pocket it.joe817 wrote:I see your point, and well taken. I'm sure that is critical(with a semi-auto) in a competition shoot, but in a real life situation I'm not sure I could remember the number of rounds I have fired, before remembering that one is left in the chamber before I have to reload...if it reaches that point. I pray to God that I never reach that point.
I think of it as self-preservation: another forum member might be in the same place someday when my gun runs dry at the wrong time, so it's in all of our best interests to make sure all the armed good guys are as effective as possible. (well, except for the "my CHL is for my benefit only, so I'm just going to ignore the guy beating a quadruplegic nun to death with an infant" crowd)OTOH, I can sure see the need to perfect the speed load in a revolver. I learn something new here every day. Thank you.
Someone practiced at it can reload a semi-auto in less than a second, and all without the pistol leaving the strong hand or the sited target. There is at least one video on youtube that demonstrates several reloading techniques for semi-autos.joe817 wrote:Is a reload on an auto any quicker??
Looks faster than the old styles, but he's still switching hands. I don't quite buy the argument that it's easier to guide the speedloader in with the strong hand, since nobody switches hands to guide mags into semiautos that way.AndyC wrote:Massad Ayoob's Stressfire reload
There's also at least one video out there that proves you can get entirely too fast with a revolver: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uisHfKj2JiI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;jsimmons wrote:Someone practiced at it can reload a semi-auto in less than a second, and all without the pistol leaving the strong hand or the sited target. There is at least one video on youtube that demonstrates several reloading techniques for semi-autos.
That's amazing! I didn't know they made a full auto revolver.There's also at least one video out there that proves you can get entirely too fast with a revolver: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uisHfKj2JiI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(six shots, reload and six more in less time than it takes me just to reload)
Personally I wouldn't throw any ammo on the ground during a gun fight, lull or not. I can perform tactical and retention reloads almost efficiently as a slide lock or speed reload. If I am in a position to top off my gun then I have the extra 2-3 tenth of a second it may take to perform a tactical or retention reload.It's also part of why I don't like the "tactical reload" or "reload with retention:" I'd rather drop the partial mag to the ground in favor of getting the fresh mag in as soon as humanly possible, and if the lull lasts long enough, (and I still want it badly enough) then I can pick up the partial and pocket it.
CompVest wrote:Personally I wouldn't throw any ammo on the ground during a gun fight, lull or not. I can perform tactical and retention reloads almost efficiently as a slide lock or speed reload. If I am in a position to top off my gun then I have the extra 2-3 tenth of a second it may take to perform a tactical or retention reload.It's also part of why I don't like the "tactical reload" or "reload with retention:" I'd rather drop the partial mag to the ground in favor of getting the fresh mag in as soon as humanly possible, and if the lull lasts long enough, (and I still want it badly enough) then I can pick up the partial and pocket it.