That when a drunk driver kills somebody, nobody wants to ban cars.
Maybe I just shouldn't think about these things this late at night.
Why is it?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
- davidtx
- Senior Member
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:24 pm
- Location: Dripping Springs, TX
- lancermit
- Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:07 am
- Location: Austin (Lakeway), TX
- Contact:
Re: Why is it?
Because drunk drivers aren't deranged lunatics intent on violence, like gun owners.
They simply made a 'mistake'. No biggie! They just get one of these:

They simply made a 'mistake'. No biggie! They just get one of these:
“You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.” -Al Capone
http://www.lonestarguntraining.com
http://www.lonestarguntraining.com
- TDDude
- Senior Member
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:03 pm
- Location: Northwest Houston
Re: Why is it?
I'm sure that dude at Luby's killed a few when his car crashed through the wall but it's the gun that gets the blame.
Ray F.
Luke 22:35-38 "Gear up boys, I gotta go and it's gonna get rough." JC
-- Darrell Royal, former UT football coach - "If worms carried pistols, birds wouldn't eat 'em."

Luke 22:35-38 "Gear up boys, I gotta go and it's gonna get rough." JC
-- Darrell Royal, former UT football coach - "If worms carried pistols, birds wouldn't eat 'em."

- marksiwel
- Banned
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:35 pm
- Location: Cedar Park/Austin
Re: Why is it?
because everybody drives and not everbody shoots.
So there is a stigma of guns being Dangerous and Exotic, while being a drunk is almost socially acceptable because everyone has had a few too many
So there is a stigma of guns being Dangerous and Exotic, while being a drunk is almost socially acceptable because everyone has had a few too many
In Capitalism, Man exploits Man. In Communism, it's just the reverse