The Annoyed Man wrote:Billy posted by quoting Oldgringo's post out of context as follows:
Bïlly wrote:Oldgringo wrote:BTW, a trained off duty LEO is not the same as a citizen with a CHL and a citizen with a CHL is definitely not the same as a trained off duty LEO. If CH licensees want to be LEO's they should apply to the respective agencies and go to the respective schools and receive the respective training. A CHL is not a BATMAN license.
So let's put it in context.
I posted my opinion that prohibiting a CHL from carrying in schools, at sporting events, etc. was a reason for righteous indignation.
Oldgringo replied and said "that there are probably pretty good reasons for the above three restrictions" on places someone with a CHL is prohibited from carrying.
jester responded that those places are not off-limits for off-duty LEO and therefore shouldn't be off-limits for CHL.
Oldgringo replied
Think really hard, you can do it.
BTW, a trained off duty LEO is not the same as a citizen with a CHL and a citizen with a CHL is definitely not the same as a trained off duty LEO. If CH licensees want to be LEO's they should apply to the respective agencies and go to the respective schools and receive the respective training.
It sounds like Billy and Oldgringo agree in principle. They draw the line in different places where off-duty police should be allowed to carry BUT an off-duty trauma nurse with a CHL should be prohibited from carrying a handgun. Both of them support a double standard. They both said there's places where they trust a LEO with a gun where they don't trust a CHL with a gun. They just have different lists.