Wilson Combat Spec Ops9 / M&P9C comparison pix

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
ccoker
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:48 pm

Wilson Combat Spec Ops9 / M&P9C comparison pix

Post by ccoker »

Wilson Combat Spec Ops 9 compared to a M&P9c
Carries better than the M&9C because it's so thin, both in Blade Tech Nano IWB holsters

Image
Image
Image
Backslider
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:17 am

Re: Wilson Combat Spec Ops9 / M&P9C comparison pix

Post by Backslider »

My brother is a big fan of the M&P, but I just can't get over the texturing on the slide and grip. I should still shoot one just to see how it is in that regard, but they do nothing for me visually.
If I had a gun for every ace I have drawn, I could arm a town the size of Abilene.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Wilson Combat Spec Ops9 / M&P9C comparison pix

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Backslider wrote:My brother is a big fan of the M&P, but I just can't get over the texturing on the slide and grip. I should still shoot one just to see how it is in that regard, but they do nothing for me visually.
Well, I'm a long time 1911 guy, and that's what I usually carry. But, a few months ago, I bought a full sized M&P 45 because I wanted a double stack striker fired pistol in .45 ACP, and I hated the way the Glocks felt in my hand. I had it down to the XD45, and then I handled an M&P, and it was all over. I have to say that I really like the gun. M&Ps aren't the only guns to have this feature, but the interchangeable back straps was a selling point for me. True, the capacity is limited to 10+1, but it also makes for a very handy gun for a double stack .45, and it is still slightly more capacity than a 1911.

It also seems to point naturally the way a 1911 does. And another thing I like about - which I also did like about the Glock, by the way - is that the gun sits down low in the hand. It is about the same length overall as my 5" springfield, and marginally wider in all its dimensions. But it is no where near as wide as a .45 caliber Glock. And bonus points.... it shoots very well.

I really like that Wilson 9mm, but at $1995.00 a copy, you can get 3 or 4 of the M&P9c pistols, or a matching set of an M&P15 rifle and a pistol to go with it. So as desirable as the Wilson is, I don't think you justify it by comparing it to a $500 gun. A better comparison would be to another $1995.00 gun. Sure is a nice gun though.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
ccoker
Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:48 pm

Re: Wilson Combat Spec Ops9 / M&P9C comparison pix

Post by ccoker »

I like the M&Ps a lot

My comparison was just for size reference when used for CHL and in particular IWB
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”