Choice for Pocket Revolver

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

bnc
Senior Member
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 7:34 pm

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by bnc »

J-frame or LCR as everyone has said. I went with the LCR since the trigger is so nice right out of the box and am very pleased with it.
rdcrags
Senior Member
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:54 pm
Location: Houston and Colorado

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by rdcrags »

S&W 342 (titanium cylinder), 38. Uncle Mike pocket holster. Trigger spring too tight, replaced it. Revolver too light for comfortable firing, but really easy to carry.
TX CHL 1997
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by WildBill »

S&W 360PD

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=39572" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by Oldgringo »

Oldgringo wrote:S&W 637, 638 or 642 all in .38 Spl. S&W is currently offering a $50 mail-in rebate to help you decide.
BTW, these are not toys. They are not fun to shoot but they will get the job done.
User avatar
couzin
Senior Member
Posts: 1004
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:12 pm
Location: Terrell, Texas

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by couzin »

I looked at the S&W Bodyguard. The cylinder release I could get used to I guess since it sorta falls where the trigger once was. I did not like the laser on/off/pulse button location on top of the gun - you have to think about where it is and turn it on, then select the mode.
“Only at the end do you realize the power of the Dark Side.”
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by The Annoyed Man »

M&P340 here. I used to have a 642, and it's a good choice, but I traded it to another forum member in exchange for a 640 .357. I decided that I really liked the .357, but the 640 was just a tad heavy for pocket carry. So when I had the money put aside, I sprung for the scandium framed 340. I have no regrets whatsoever, and this one is a keeper. I often pocket carry it, whether or not I'm also carrying something else.

I've kept the stainless 640 for use as a kit gun too. That pistol has a really great trigger. I just need to get a decent holster for it.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
Winchster
Senior Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Rhome

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by Winchster »

The LCR has a better trigger than the smith's out of the box. I have a 442 no lock in .38 but my next one will be an LCR in .357
What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?
edmart001
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:59 pm

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by edmart001 »

+1 for LCR.
User avatar
TLE2
Senior Member
Posts: 755
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:45 pm
Location: Houston Texas Area

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by TLE2 »

[Slight hijack]
What's the 357 version of the 442? I think I shy away for S&W pistols because they're just so many models.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)

... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840
User avatar
Winchster
Senior Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Rhome

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by Winchster »

What's the 357 version of the 442? I think I shy away for S&W pistols because they're just so many models.
Expensive. :rolll
What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Winchster wrote:
What's the 357 version of the 442? I think I shy away for S&W pistols because they're just so many models.
Expensive. :rolll
The scandium models are expensive, as are the titanium guns of other manufacturers. OTH, S&W also has a polymer framed revolver, the Bodyguard, which costs much less than the scandium framed pistols.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Griffen
Member
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:10 am
Location: Coppell

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by Griffen »

If I'm not carrying my XD9sc in my IWB, I can always drop my Taurus 22mag in my pocket for my dog walking. Don't underestimate an 8 shot revolver in 22 mag.
Lifetime NRA Member
Member Texas Firearms Coalition

In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress. -John Adams
7075-T7
Senior Member
Posts: 732
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Little Elm

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by 7075-T7 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:The scandium models are expensive, as are the titanium guns of other manufacturers. OTH, S&W also has a polymer framed revolver, the Bodyguard, which costs much less than the scandium framed pistols.
With the rebate S&W is offering and if you know where to look, you can get one of the new scandium PD models for ~$760 (before tax), way below the $1200 MSRP.

Plus, at 11.4oz you can throw it in any pants pocket (even swimming trunks when you run out to wallmart for the wife :oops: ) and it won't weight them down. And, with the adrenaline of a life threatening deadly force encounter, I doubt recoil and muzzle blast will matter much.
Salty1
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by Salty1 »

+1 on the LCR, it will be the best $400 you ever spent.....
Salty1
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Choice for Pocket Revolver

Post by The Annoyed Man »

7075-T7 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:The scandium models are expensive, as are the titanium guns of other manufacturers. OTH, S&W also has a polymer framed revolver, the Bodyguard, which costs much less than the scandium framed pistols.
With the rebate S&W is offering and if you know where to look, you can get one of the new scandium PD models for ~$760 (before tax), way below the $1200 MSRP.

Plus, at 11.4oz you can throw it in any pants pocket (even swimming trunks when you run out to wallmart for the wife :oops: ) and it won't weight them down. And, with the adrenaline of a life threatening deadly force encounter, I doubt recoil and muzzle blast will matter much.
My M&P340 weighs a VAST 13.3 oz due to it's stainless cylinder. :mrgreen:

And it doesn't drag my pants down either. I paid $789 for mine. Yes, that is more than $440-$500, but I also think that, for the most part, you get what you paid for.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”