State Fair Digest

[Dragonfighter]

Working from the poll and comments posted I digested the information into a pdf. I apologize for the delay but life interfered.

Get it here.

I noticed some glaring typos so I resent the file. Should be good now.

[The Annoyed Man]

A very comprehensive report. I'm impressed.

[Teamless]

Nice work Dragonfighter

[Dragonfighter]

Thanks for the kind words. I have noted a couple more typos but, oh well.

[wally775]

Excellent work and well arranged.

Thank you for your time.

[Hoi Polloi]

How many gate indiscretions did you have reported? It seems to me that the sample size of indiscretions was probably too small to draw firm correlations, much less conclusions.

[Dragonfighter]

How many gate indiscretions did you have reported? It seems to me that the sample size of indiscretions was probably too small to draw firm correlations, much less conclusions.

Three (roughly 6%), one being outed, one "rude" (surly) behavior and one ignoring/unnecessary delay. In past years those gates consistently were the "problem" areas. Not exactly a correlation but most definitely an association.

Remember this was not a scientifically structured exercise and the "sampling size" was too small to correlate the over all CHL experience at the fair, period. Fifty plus responses and a few comments can hardly be correlated for what must have been thousands of CHL visitors. But it is sufficient to sense trends.

If the report helps, great but it's only worth what you paid for it.

[ELB]

Interesting.

Added to the list

http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php? ... 19#p456319" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Lonest4r]

Well done! I was not subject to the blatant disregard of privacy that occured last year, as I did not have my CHL yet, but I can tell that this year ran much smoother.