Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by seamusTX »

The battleship Texas was commissioned in 1914 and is the only ship still afloat that served in WW I and WW II. She was decomissioned in 1948 and is currently berthed in the Houston ship channel adjacent to the San Jacinto Monument.

Time has taken its toll, and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is now starting a project to put Texas in drydock permanently.

Image
http://www.battleshiptexas.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This ship is huge, and if you want to talk about "big guns," a 14-incher that you could stick your head into trumps your .45.

- Jim
Fear, anger, hatred, and greed. The devil's all-you-can-eat buffet.
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by Oldgringo »

Those WW II dreadnoughts that we've visited; e.g., TEXAS, ALABAMA, NORTH CAROLINA, somehow kinda' look like dinghys when compared to the behemoth cruise ships of today. {SIGH}
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I just saw a documentary about the Texas on TV the other day.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
stinkbait
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:57 pm
Location: South East Texas

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by stinkbait »

I,ve been there a couple times, I need to go back and see that ship. Being in a permanent berth might be the thing to perserve her longer.
User avatar
USA1
Senior Member
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by USA1 »

I have fond memories of touring the Texas as a lad.
The family and I visited a few years back so that I could share the same experience with my children.
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
User avatar
seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Battleship Tevxas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by seamusTX »

Oldgringo wrote:Those WW II dreadnoughts that we've visited... somehow kinda' look like dinghys when compared to the behemoth cruise ships of today.
Maybe, but cruise ships are somewhat lacking in armaments.

The few times that I have visited naval ships, I was surprised how cramped they seemed. They just don't have a lot of spare room. By contrast, cruise ships have staterooms with full baths, lounges, dining rooms, swimming pools, gyms, and so forth.

- Jim
User avatar
jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by jimlongley »

I got a kick out of, and sent an email about, a news article on tv about this last night. The talked about Texas and dry berthing her, but kept showing a video of a destroyer.

I lived on a WWII destroyer, the USS Zellars DD777, for 3 years, 25 days, 16 hours, and 37 minutes from log book entry in to logbook entry out, and cramped is a kind term for the living quarters even on a newer ship like that.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar
OldSchool
Senior Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Brazoria County

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by OldSchool »

I just compared the picture in the OP with an image of the George Washington in the WSJ just now. The tugs look pretty much the same size -- making the GW look like it would hold two of the Texas. Wow!
Life is for learning.
IANAL, thank gosh!
NRA Life Member - TSRA - PSC
NRA Certified Basic Rifle Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer

12/23/2009: Packets delivered.
01/15/2010: Plastic in hand!
texasag93
Senior Member
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: Denton

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by texasag93 »

This ship is huge, and if you want to talk about "big guns," a 14-incher that you could stick your head into trumps your .45.

- Jim[/quote]

....but try to conceal it.

.....but finding an Uncle Mikes holster is hard.

It is a long gun, so it can be open carried in Texas.

My brother in law is a tank commander, he always makes fun of me when I talk about my "big bore" .460 Wetherby Magnum rifle.

texasag
texasag93
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by Oldgringo »

OldSchool wrote:I just compared the picture in the OP with an image of the George Washington in the WSJ just now. The tugs look pretty much the same size -- making the GW look like it would hold two of the Texas. Wow!
The same is true for the B-17, B-24 and B-29's. These ladies were the dreadnoughts of the skies during WW II. They pale in comparison to the passenger airliners of today. Did y'all know that these bombers of WW II were driven and crewed by 20-22 year old Americans? Look around you and think about that for a minute or two.
User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by ELB »

Oldgringo wrote: ...
The same is true for the B-17, B-24 and B-29's. These ladies were the dreadnoughts of the skies during WW II. They pale in comparison to the passenger airliners of today...
When I was PCS'ing to Los Angeles, I drove the I-10 and discovered to my delight it went past the Commemorative Air Force Museum, so I stopped and looked around. Fifi, their flying B-29 was there at the time. I was a bit boggled, because the night before at the motel I was watching a History Channel documentary on the B-29 with interviews of the first pilots -- and they all talked about how big they thought it was. One pilot said the first time he saw it, he thought it looked too big to take off. Yet as I stood there, it looked like it would fit under the wing of one of the AWACS E-3s that I had been associated with for the past ten years. :mrgreen: (And altho the E-3 is a "heavy," the USAF flies several larger aircraft types).
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar
OldSchool
Senior Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Brazoria County

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by OldSchool »

Oldgringo wrote:
OldSchool wrote:I just compared the picture in the OP with an image of the George Washington in the WSJ just now. The tugs look pretty much the same size -- making the GW look like it would hold two of the Texas. Wow!
The same is true for the B-17, B-24 and B-29's. These ladies were the dreadnoughts of the skies during WW II. They pale in comparison to the passenger airliners of today. Did y'all know that these bombers of WW II were driven and crewed by 20-22 year old Americans? Look around you and think about that for a minute or two.
Yes, I knew plenty of those (grown-up) kids, and my family are all still amazed at the quality and invention that went into those bombers and fighters (compare the size of a P-51 to an F-15 or F-4). Also interesting is the average age of the American military in that war -- much older than in the conflicts since then. However, I'm personally familiar of the maturity of character of the current crop of GI's. :patriot: :patriot:
Life is for learning.
IANAL, thank gosh!
NRA Life Member - TSRA - PSC
NRA Certified Basic Rifle Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer

12/23/2009: Packets delivered.
01/15/2010: Plastic in hand!
User avatar
jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by jimlongley »

Oldgringo wrote:
OldSchool wrote:I just compared the picture in the OP with an image of the George Washington in the WSJ just now. The tugs look pretty much the same size -- making the GW look like it would hold two of the Texas. Wow!
The same is true for the B-17, B-24 and B-29's. These ladies were the dreadnoughts of the skies during WW II. They pale in comparison to the passenger airliners of today. Did y'all know that these bombers of WW II were driven and crewed by 20-22 year old Americans? Look around you and think about that for a minute or two.
And younger too. Our next door neighbor when I was a kid was 16 when he enlisted in 1940, and shortly, due to his experience as a ham radio operator, assigned as a radio operator/gunner on a B25. Tales of his service during the war came from his younger brother, and in retrospect should be considered somewhat tall, but as an Army brat I was pretty good at identifying service ribbons so I know he served in both Europe and the Pacific. He was discharged when he was 21, right at the end of the war, married his high-school sweetheart and his oldest child was my age. He served in the reserves under my father for many years.

George H.W. Bush was still short of his 19th birthday when he was appointed an Ensign after completing his flight training.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I think I might have posted it elsewhere on this forum before, but this is a letter my dad wrote a couple of years before he died. He makes reference in it to his age and the age of his men. He was neither a bomber crewman nor a sailor. He was a 2nd Lt in the Marine infantry. This letter was written to the organizer of his OCS class reunion, to apologize for not being able to be there. I've highlighted in red the sentence pertinent to age...
I'm inspired to write to you by both the last and the next to last issues. You have a tiger by the tail (I know. I'm the editor of the Joseph Conrad society newsletter), but you seem to have a solid grip, for which many thanks. In the latter issue, Jack Bradford mentioned George Todd, and as I was with him when he died in Cushman's Pocket on Iwo, I thought his friends might like to know about it. George didn't have to go, by the way. He had been hit in the chest by a hard line drive in a game of baseball that caused one of his breasts to swell up like a melon. He was in the divisional hospital and instructed to stay in bed, but he sneaked out, made the trek over the highest peak on Guam (per the Big E's orders -- the Big E was Graves B. Erskine, commanding general of the 3rd). George and I came ashore together out of that part of the 28th Replacement draft that had been attached to the 3rd Marines, who by then were being held in reserve for Okinawa. We were met on the beach by Ray Folks, who was the exec, and, given orders to join the 2nd Bn, 9th Marines, Lt. Col. Robert L. Cushman commanding. Ray and George and I had all gone through Oxy V-12, the same boot camp, and, of course, SOCS. And George and I were from Glendale. We were assigned to Easy Co., given some replacements and a couple of days to get ready. Fully replaced, Easy Co. consisted of some 46 men and officers divided into two platoons each of which was made up of two rifle squads of two fire groups plus a miscellaneous squad, machine guns, etc. After two days of getting acquainted and bombarded (those lousy rockets), we were sent to the lines (Easy was on the extreme left flank of the 3rd Mar Div, touching the 3rd airfield). Col. Cushman then called George and me back to explain that the next morning early, two hours before the first light, we would attack up the hill which 3 or 4 previous assaults had failed to take. The idea was to surprise the enemy. The point was to get past the end of the third airfield. That way we could join up with the 5th Division, whose right flank touched the airfield. That way we could stop some of the infiltration that had been coming down the airstrip. We went right up the hill without a shot being fired, though of course, we traversed several hundred yards of sleeping or amazed Japanese (we were not known as night fighters) who later, it turned out, were determined not to let us back down the hill. Col. Cushman had warned us, rightly enough, that the men would want to bunch up and not stay out on a line and that they would drift to their right and away from that empty flank. The trip up the hill turned out to be an ongoing effort on George's and my part to push men back to the left, to keep them strung out and not bunched up. We were even partially successful which was amazing, given the handicap of near silence that we had to impose on ourselves. Once there, we had about an hour left to try and settle in, hard to do in the pitch dark. George and I were busy as hell stumbling around in the dark. At one point he and I started to climb up on a mound of dirt in order to get a look toward the flank, but the mound began to throb and then to move. They had nearly perfectly disguised one of their tanks, but when we started scraping around on it, we must have scared the hell out of them, a favor they returned. We found shell holes, trenches, cisterns, what have you, but because of the precipitous ground we couldn't prepare protection over the full 360 degrees. Because of the extreme pitch of the land, protection from the rear and the flanks was the hardest. And we paid the price, particularly as they were mostly behind us; and one son-of-a-bitch amongst them was a first-rate sharpshooter. Within minutes of the first light he had killed my favorite amongst the men, a kid of 18, my sergeant, and George, a bullet between the eyes. It was instantaneous. And he got me in the solar plexus. The ironies abound, for if my rifleman was a kid of 18, George and I were kids of 22, though acting like men, and my sergeant was a kid of 25. The bullet that hit me turned out not to have gone through, though I didn't know it at the time as there was an exit wound on the rear quarter of my left side. It hit a button on my jacket, which broke it up and caused the core to go around my chest cage outside my chest cage outside the ribs but inside the skin.

Then came the mortars, which chewed up what was left of us. We finally were able, thanks to George's sergeant, Thomas Barrow, to withdraw to a small point that the ten of us who remained could defend. I nominated him for a medal, and he was awarded the Navy Cross. We wouldn't have made it without him. He took over when I was still out under morphine, and later, when he was wounded again, I could take over. We were obliged by what you might call circumstances to stay out there for nearly twenty four hours, there being no way that we could get out in daylight hours. Col. Cushman sent tanks up to evacuate us, but he ended losing them and the men in them at a rate that didn't calculate. I think that I have never heard a voice so forlorn as when he told us we were on our own. We finally made it out after several disastrous attempts -- at night, as we had come. We took a terrible pasting just trying to get out of the Japanese strong point that we held, but we finally made it down to within proximity of our lines, where we met and killed a Japanese soldier (the only one we met once we had made it out of our little fortress) who might have done us a great deal of harm by setting off the alarm. We had all been wounded for nearly twenty-four hours and had lost a good deal of blood. We were tired and getting slow. I was able to crawl on my back (couldn't crawl on my gut) along those deep tracks the tanks left in the volcanic sand (which is where all the men were stashed), and that way I was able to get down to our lines unseen and in. The lieutenant in charge of the platoon that had taken up our places was Aime Hourcade, also of the SOCS. He was enormously helpful - got stretchers out immediately, covering riflemen, and got the seven others (all wounded, all that was left of the 46) in for me, I haven't seen Aime since. We were all in the same V-12, same boot camp platoon, and then SOCS. Does anybody know where he is?

I read somewhere, perhaps in the History of the Third Marine Division, that General H.M. Smith said that of all the battles of the Pacific, Iwo was the worst, and of all the engagements on Iwo, that at Cushman's Pocket was the worst. I don't want to take away from anyone else's, and "worst" is hard to measure anyway (as my surgeon said to me, major and minor surgery is determined by whether it's happening to me or to you); but it was grim. I should like to add that being an officer in the Marine Corps, serving under Col Robert L. Cushman, and, for that matter, serving in Cushman's Pocket have all been elements in a central core of pride that has governed my life these past forty five years.

Your last last issue brought me up to date on Bill Speary -- the same phenomenon that others have noted. He took on heroic proportions for me at SOCS, where, God knows, we needed heroes. You remember those wonderful night problems? Our turn came and we got dropped in the middle of nowhere (actually it was in the middle of a swamp) in the pitch dark, told to follow an azimuth, and if we were good boys, which the sergeants all doubted we were, we would come out at a given point after several hours, and we would find a truck to take us back to the rifle range. If we weren't good, we would have to find our own way home and would have to be there by reveille. It struck most of us, milling around there in the pitch dark, that the sergeants were probably right. Confusion was the enemy. How were we to get a whole platoon through the swamp in good order when it was hard enough for one. Suddenly Speary asked if anyone had noticed a rotten tree stump. He rooted around till he found one, took the crumbling wood, which glowed in the dark, and passed the chunks out amongst us. A piece of rotten tree stump placed in the web belt let the guy behind know where you were. Then it turned out that Speary had another quality. He could smell water, I mean in terms of feet -- like he could smell it and tell us if it was five feet away or nearly under foot. Anyway, he got us through the problem and on time, thus disappointing our tormentors. Speary had a problem with snakes, though, at least as I recall. On June 6 we were on a bivouac and were listening on the major's jeep radio to the news of the Normandy landings when Speary, who had been dozing on his back, head cupped in his helmet, shot into the air. A serpent had decided to sun itself on his chest. Always wondered if that were natural.

And other name, Nowicki. Wasn't he that really sweet guy who decided to get married down there? And didn't he get goosed by an M-1 during one of those stretches where we went single file between attack and defense problems? And wasn't the M-1 loaded with a blank (thank God) that somehow went off and burned Nowicki's nether parts to a crisp in a way that caused a change to his wedding and honeymoon plans? I'm not imagining all this am I? If it wasn't Nowicki, who was it? And Tony (The Nose Knows) Novak? How did I get to know all these N's? Their fame, I suppose.
I used to think that they don't hardly make 'em like that anymore, but what I have seen in young people today in our armed services has changed my opinion. If they're typical, then we're in fine shape. It is interesting to note that Time Magazine war correspondent Robert Sherrod, before the landings on Bettio in which he particpated, once wrote that he didn't think that the nation's young men had what it took to win a war, because he thought they were largely pampered and shiftless. He also didn't think that America back home would truly come to grips with what it was going to take to win the war until after Saipan. Sherrod participated in the landings at Attu, Tarawa, Saipan, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. That is a lot of combat.
Last edited by The Annoyed Man on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
MadMonkey
Senior Member
Posts: 1352
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:23 am
Location: North Texas

Re: Battleship Texas perhaps finds her final resting place

Post by MadMonkey »

ELB wrote:
Oldgringo wrote: ...
The same is true for the B-17, B-24 and B-29's. These ladies were the dreadnoughts of the skies during WW II. They pale in comparison to the passenger airliners of today...
When I was PCS'ing to Los Angeles, I drove the I-10 and discovered to my delight it went past the Commemorative Air Force Museum, so I stopped and looked around. Fifi, their flying B-29 was there at the time. I was a bit boggled, because the night before at the motel I was watching a History Channel documentary on the B-29 with interviews of the first pilots -- and they all talked about how big they thought it was. One pilot said the first time he saw it, he thought it looked too big to take off. Yet as I stood there, it looked like it would fit under the wing of one of the AWACS E-3s that I had been associated with for the past ten years. :mrgreen: (And altho the E-3 is a "heavy," the USAF flies several larger aircraft types).
I toured Fifi this year and was shocked at how small it was. I've seen just about every military plane the US has had in person except that one, and it REALLY threw me how tiny it seemed from the outside (surprisingly large inside, though).

I always get such a sense of pride when I'm around military planes, especially from the WWII era.


As for the Texas, I've never toured her (seen her in person) but I've been on the Alabama, Lexington, and a few smaller ships. Just reinforces my plans to never serve in a tank or on a ship "rlol"

The last cruise I was on some woman made a comment to the effect that "Well, at least it's not as big as the Titanic!". I didn't have the heart to tell her that it was around 120' longer and had almost twice the displacement "rlol"
“Beware the fury of a patient man.” - John Dryden
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”