FNAR vs. M1A

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Abraham »

I'm maaaaaybe buying an FNAR, but I would like to know if the M1A is a better rifle.

Anyone know the differences?

Thanks!
User avatar
Terlingueno
Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 2:21 pm
Location: Greater Terlingua Metropolitan Area

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Terlingueno »

The M1A is based on the Garand action. The FNAR is based more or less on the BAR. The M1A is graceful and a beauty. The FNAR is the most butt ugly rifle I have ever seen.
RECIT
Senior Member
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by RECIT »

What is the intended purpose of these fine rifles. I am partial to the M1A cause they rock, lots of parts and upgrades available, mags are affordable, scope mounts are a plenty, and they come with iron sights. My vote goes for the SOCOM model w/ or w/out the rail. Short barrel, night sights, muzzle break, and plenty of punch.

The FNAR is... accurate. I have never shot one but handled quite a few at shows and local shops.
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
User avatar
G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts: 2987
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by G.A. Heath »

I own an FNAR and have shot a few M1A's. To describe the FNAR I would say it is the most fugly, heaviest, and accurate 7.62x51 (.308) I have ever shot. Now the M1A is also accurate, has style, and doesn't weigh as much although recoil is much more pronounced with the M1A. Decide what you want the gun for and then get the one that best fits your needs. And its based on the Browning BAR hunting rifle.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
User avatar
McKnife
Senior Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Houston

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by McKnife »

Not to hijack, but have you ever researched the FN FAL?
:coolgleamA:
Zoomie
Senior Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:32 pm

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Zoomie »

"Speed is fine accuracy is final."
-Wyatt Earp

"Great danger lies in the notion we can reason with evil."
-Winston Churchill

And the wind shall say 'Here were decent godless people'. Their only monument the asphalt road and a thousand lost golf balls.
-T.S Elliot
dicion
Senior Member
Posts: 2099
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Houston Northwest

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by dicion »

the FNAR may be ugly, but you can't argue with it's performance.
bigred90gt
Senior Member
Posts: 301
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by bigred90gt »

Just on aesthetics alone, I prefer the FNAR. Having never fired either one, if I had to choose just by looking at them, I would without a doubt end up with the FNAR.
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Abraham »

Thanks one and all for the help.

As to it's looks, the FNAR actually appeals to me in it's looks, but then I think Glocks look fine too, beauty being in the eye of the beholder and all that...
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by The Annoyed Man »

On the day that I bought my M1A Loaded, there was a heavy barreled FNAR on the shelf right next to it. They were within $20 of one another in price - both being over $1,700.00. At that price point, $20 isn't enough to make a difference. They both had stocks of roughly the same color, and they both had roughly the same size and heft.

I knew that the NFAR would be the more accurate of the two. FN guarantees .5 MOA for the heavy barreled rifle. Very few rifle makers will guarantee that for a bolt action rifle, let alone a semi-auto, and the FNAR gives the impression of being built like a bank vault. OTH, the FN is an unproven quantity in terms of ruggedness. It looks reasonably rugged, and it is based on the modern BAR action which has a good reputation for reliability as a hunting rifle, but the FNAR has no real track record as a TEOTWAWKI rifle.

The M1A/M14, at least the "Loaded" version, will shoot to 1 MOA-1.25 MOA using most commercial ammo, and can be coaxed down to .5 MOA with the right load. It is actually battle tested, both in its current format, and as the M1 Garand action in WW2 - the greatest battle implement ever devised, according to General Patton. It is easy to break down and clean, and its mechanisms are simple and easy to understand. Like today's AR15 and the AK47, the M1A was built for unsophisticated soldiers, with no particular previous history of riflemanship, to be able to feed, care for, and to be combat-effective with it. The fact that it is reasonably accurate for a battle rifle is bonus points.

The FNAR has its own "charm," but its visual design leaves me cold personally. OTH, I have wanted an M1A/M14 since I was in high school in the 1960s. It was a no-brainer. I bought the M1A. The NFAR may be the better rifle (or not), but if it is, it isn't better by much. My ultimate impression is that the FNAR is a technocrat's rifle, while the M1A is a rifleman's rifle.

I chose the M1A, and I have no regrets. I love showing off my M1A:
Image
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
Abraham
Senior Member
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Abraham »

TAM,

It IS a beauty!
User avatar
Commander Cody
Senior Member
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Texas City/Trinity

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Commander Cody »

TAM, I'm with you on the M1A. I'd love to have a M21, but just don't know where to get one.
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson USMC 1967-1970 101st. Underwater Mess Kit Repair Battalion - Spoon Platoon.
KinnyLee
Senior Member
Posts: 1295
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 12:59 pm
Contact:

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by KinnyLee »

Commander Cody wrote:TAM, I'm with you on the M1A. I'd love to have a M21, but just don't know where to get one.
http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/prod ... s_id/27527" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Now you have no excuse. :woohoo

Always wanted a Scout. +1 on the M1A
User avatar
Commander Cody
Senior Member
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Texas City/Trinity

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Commander Cody »

Like everyone else... it's out of stock. And no one knows when they will be in stock.
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson USMC 1967-1970 101st. Underwater Mess Kit Repair Battalion - Spoon Platoon.
Carry-a-Kimber
Senior Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:58 am
Location: Harris County

Re: FNAR vs. M1A

Post by Carry-a-Kimber »

Commander Cody wrote:TAM, I'm with you on the M1A. I'd love to have a M21, but just don't know where to get one.
http://www.impactguns.com/store/706397031312.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”