Glad you cleared that up...I was beginning to worry.baldeagle wrote:Forgot to answer the OP.
NO!!

Moderator: carlson1
Glad you cleared that up...I was beginning to worry.baldeagle wrote:Forgot to answer the OP.
NO!!

They can have some of mine, then they'll never need to buy it again.Stupid wrote:If your answer is no, then what do you propose to cut off the source of ammo for bad guys?
Why should I have to justify not infringing upon my rights any further than they've already been spit upon?Stupid wrote:I think merely answering no is not enough. What's the rationale behind your "no"?
What's the main source for bad guys to get ammo? Stores, right?
If your answer is no, then what do you propose to cut off the source of ammo for bad guys?


 
 Prison doors do a fair job. Let them serve more of their sentences. Parolees should be subject to stop and frisk, as well.Stupid wrote:If your answer is no, then what do you propose to cut off the source of ammo for bad guys?
Stupid wrote:I think merely answering no is not enough. What's the rationale behind your "no"?
What's the main source for bad guys to get ammo? Stores, right?
If your answer is no, then what do you propose to cut off the source of ammo for bad guys?
 I don’t understand the fixation with ‘how and where the bad guys get their guns and ammo’. There has never been a preemptive law that has worked (unless the goal was to make criminals of, otherwise, law abiding citizens).
 I don’t understand the fixation with ‘how and where the bad guys get their guns and ammo’. There has never been a preemptive law that has worked (unless the goal was to make criminals of, otherwise, law abiding citizens).
As for me, Absolutely NOT.Stupid wrote:Would anybody support a NCIC check for buying ammo? Is there any problem with this idea?
