New/Old Sig 9mm

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
HankB
Senior Member
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Central TX, just west of Austin

New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by HankB »

Well, I just found out that Sig is bringing back the classic P210 design. It's the only SIG I've handled that actually has good "pointability" in my hands. It has some improvements (like the magazine release) over most prior P210 variations, but it remains to be seen whether or not it exhibits the level of workmanship that made the earlier P210s the highly-regarded pistols they were.

The blurb at the website emphasizes the slide is machined from solid billet steel, but doesn't really say much about the frame other than it being carbon steel . . . makes me wonder if it's a casting. We'll see . . .

Cost is said to be in the neighborhood of $2200.

http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductDetails/p210.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
User avatar
Pug
Senior Member
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: FW

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by Pug »

HankB wrote:Well, I just found out that Sig is bringing back the classic P210 design...Cost is said to be in the neighborhood of $2200.
:eek6
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by Dave2 »

Pug wrote:
HankB wrote:Well, I just found out that Sig is bringing back the classic P210 design...Cost is said to be in the neighborhood of $2200.
:eek6
I think it's $2100 for the regular one and $2300 for the match version. I think. Don't quote me on that. Also, I think those are list, not street prices.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Let me get this straight....

A 37 oz, 4.7" barreled 9mm with an 8 round capacity.....for $2200. It seems like the only advantage this pistol has is its narrow width and full length rails. As far as paintability, the profile seems to imitate a 1911A1 with the curved mainspring housing.

So, for $2200, why not buy two 1911s in 9mm with a curved mainspring housing?

The sig looks like an interesting gun, but other than as a collector piece, I'm not seeing the value of it. Certainly not as a carry piece.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
glbedd53
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by glbedd53 »

No the P-210 was not a carry piece, it was an unmatched quality piece. Machined from high quality steel blocks, not stamped and welded. I remember reading about gun experts(for what that's worth)calling it the best pistol for police and military to ever leave a factory. There were some pretty impressive stories about the accuracy too. Never been in my price range or I would have owned one long ago.
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by Dave2 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:Let me get this straight....

A 37 oz, 4.7" barreled 9mm with an 8 round capacity.....for $2200. It seems like the only advantage this pistol has is its narrow width and full length rails. As far as paintability, the profile seems to imitate a 1911A1 with the curved mainspring housing.

So, for $2200, why not buy two 1911s in 9mm with a curved mainspring housing?

The sig looks like an interesting gun, but other than as a collector piece, I'm not seeing the value of it. Certainly not as a carry piece.
It's supposed to be the most accurate handgun ever (I can't remember if that's in 9mm or in general).
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by WildBill »

HankB wrote:Well, I just found out that Sig is bringing back the classic P210 design. It's the only SIG I've handled that actually has good "pointability" in my hands. It has some improvements (like the magazine release) over most prior P210 variations, but it remains to be seen whether or not it exhibits the level of workmanship that made the earlier P210s the highly-regarded pistols they were.

The blurb at the website emphasizes the slide is machined from solid billet steel, but doesn't really say much about the frame other than it being carbon steel . . . makes me wonder if it's a casting. We'll see . . .

Cost is said to be in the neighborhood of $2200.
The Annoyed Man wrote:Let me get this straight....
A 37 oz, 4.7" barreled 9mm with an 8 round capacity.....for $2200. It seems like the only advantage this pistol has is its narrow width and full length rails. As far as paintability, the profile seems to imitate a 1911A1 with the curved mainspring housing.
To each his own. I have known people to spend this kind of money on a rifle made of black plastic. ;-)
NRA Endowment Member
glbedd53
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by glbedd53 »

The few P-210s I've seen are probably all rusted now from me droolin all over em.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26892
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by The Annoyed Man »

glbedd53 wrote:No the P-210 was not a carry piece, it was an unmatched quality piece. Machined from high quality steel blocks, not stamped and welded. I remember reading about gun experts(for what that's worth)calling it the best pistol for police and military to ever leave a factory. There were some pretty impressive stories about the accuracy too. Never been in my price range or I would have owned one long ago.
Well, the accuracy part would certainly be due in part to those full length rails in the frame riding outboard of the slide, rather than inboard as on a 1911. I conceded that they might have value as a collector item too, as I posted above. I just had never heard of these before, and it did strike me as somewhat limited as a carry piece by both its weight and capacity—and this being a CHL forum, I wasn't sure if that was what the OP was referring to or not. On the other hand, I'll bet that its weight makes it a fairly soft shooter for a 9mm.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
glbedd53
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 5:05 pm

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by glbedd53 »

If I had one it sure wouldn't be a carry piece. I would be afraid I might scratch it, and you know it would get holster wear. I think I would sure enjoy shooting it at the range .
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3167
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by Dave2 »

glbedd53 wrote:If I had one it sure wouldn't be a carry piece. I would be afraid I might scratch it, and you know it would get holster wear. I think I would sure enjoy shooting it at the range .
I can see a nice gun being my "dressed up" gun, but I'd still be carrying it. (Or, more likely, I'd decide that I don't want to spend that much in the first place.)
Last edited by Dave2 on Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by WildBill »

Dave2 wrote:
glbedd53 wrote:If I had one it sure wouldn't be a carry piece. I would be afraid I might scratch it, and you know it would get holster wear. I think I would sure enjoy shooting it at the range .
I can see a nice gun being my "dressed up" gun, but I'd still be carrying it. (Or, more likely, decide that I don't want to spend that much.)
I think that this one is too big for concealed carry, but it would make a nice BBQ rig.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar
Pug
Senior Member
Posts: 332
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: FW

Re: New/Old Sig 9mm

Post by Pug »

WildBill wrote:I think that this one is too big for concealed carry, but it would make a nice BBQ rig.
Image

Prolly right...
:smilelol5:
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”