I guess she is right and I try to remind myself of that but watch the hands, always watch the hands.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Do you eat green bananas or tomato's?not to be bias or profile a certain stereotype...
Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Do you eat green bananas or tomato's?not to be bias or profile a certain stereotype...
Wouldn't want to be biased, would you?
![]()
There is NOTHING wrong with bias OR profiling as long as your criteria is based on fact or experience. BOTH are survival skills developed LONG before we had the "intelligent" brains we have today as humans.
After eating a few green and yellow bananas, how many more green bananas would you eat after you figured out they taste like garbage compared to the yellow bananas? Not many, if you're smart, and you PROFILE the bananas.
The same process can, and SHOULD, be used with humans. If it looks like a thug, walks and talks like a thug, then the odds are pretty good that it IS a thug, and is worthy of further scrutiny.
Brian Mobley wrote:I wanted to share a training drill of sorts that I use. When coming out of a location with a lot of foot traffic, like Walmart, I will test myself by imagining that the 3rd person I see will be a threat. I do this to keep myself honest on threat assessment and not to be bias or profile a certain sterotype. I have shared this with my wife when one day coming out of all places, Walmart, I am preparing myself to spring into my action plan (which is to scream like a little girl and run) and had on my gameface. As I saw the "bad guy" coming toward the store I realized he looked different, something was familiar and I then I saw the distinct collar of a minister. My wife got a big kick out of the deal and now when ever I voice my suspicions she reminds me that "every third person could be a minister.
I guess she is right and I try to remind myself of that but watch the hands, always watch the hands.
So much for "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."03Lightningrocks wrote:The real scam behind it all was for some kind of "tax cheat" deal. She doesn't make enough money to play that game, but anyway, the actual purpose was simply to claim ordained minister and hide money under this guise.
...good mental practice...a minister's collar would make a great disguise...they've used it in more than a couple movies...people would assume that he's the good guy...maybe so, maybe not...your idea will also remind you your threat may be a kid...or a grandma...watch the hands, watch the hands...you're exactly right...Brian Mobley wrote:I wanted to share a training drill of sorts that I use. When coming out of a location with a lot of foot traffic, like Walmart, I will test myself by imagining that the 3rd person I see will be a threat. I do this to keep myself honest on threat assesment and not to be bias or profile a certain sterotype. I have shared this with my wife when one day coming out of all places, Walmart, I am preparing myself to spring into my action plan (which is to scream like a little girl and run) and had on my gameface. As I saw the "bad guy" coming toward the store I realized he looked different, something was familiar and I then I saw the distinct collar of a minister. My wife got a big kick out of the deal and now when ever I voice my suspicions she reminds me that "every third person could be a minister.
I guess she is right and I try to remind myself of that but watch the hands, always watch the hands.
Why limit yourself to every 3rd person? How about "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet."Brian Mobley wrote: I will test myself by imagining that the 3rd person I see will be a threat.