Issue with new S&W629 - Update
Moderator: carlson1
-
7075-T7
- Senior Member
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
- Location: Little Elm
Issue with new S&W629 - Update
I'm trying to decide if this is a "problem" or I'm just being silly. I recently purchased a new S&W 629 6" revolver. It shoots great and seems to be accurate, but when I was cleaning it, I noticed that the Cylinder is FILTHY in a way I've never seen before in any of my revolvers. I'm used to the slight burn/carbon ring near the face of the cylinder on the portion parallel with the barrel, but it was fouled in an odd triangular pattern pointing away from the barrel that was about .5" long, that for the life of me can not get clean. I got out a set of feeler gages and found that on the right side of the gun the cyl gap is .006-.007 but on the left side I was able to get a .014 gague in, which to me seems a bit large, and the fact it's that different concerns me.
Am I being absurd, or should I contact S&W?
Am I being absurd, or should I contact S&W?
Last edited by 7075-T7 on Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
texasmusic
- Senior Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Katy
Re: Issue with new S&W629
Is the cyl. Gap uneven on all cylinders? Sounds like a bent crane maybe from somebody hollywooding the cylinder in and out... they make alignment tools but id call S&W and have them fix it.
A lead remover cloth should get the carbon off wherever it may be. They work well for the coon eyes too.
A lead remover cloth should get the carbon off wherever it may be. They work well for the coon eyes too.
Ubi libertas habitat ibi nostra patria est
- WildBill
- Senior Member
- Posts: 17349
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Issue with new S&W629
It sounds like you may have a defective gun. I would definitely call Smith & Wesson.
NRA Endowment Member
- The Annoyed Man
- Senior Member
- Posts: 26927
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Issue with new S&W629
Interesting..... I have not noticed any uneven burning on any part of the cylinder of my 5" M29 Classic, but then I wasn't really looking for it either. Now you've got me worried enough to go check it to make sure. I suppose I'm being a little obssessive compulsive about it, but there it is.
The main thing I've noticed about dirtyness is that .44 magnum seems to leave more powder residue in the chambers and in the barrel than does .44 special (in that same revolver), or than .357 magnum/.38 special in my other revolvers. I have the dies, brass, and primers for reloading .44 magnum, but no bullets yet, so almost everything I've fired through it to date (since 1996) has been commercially loaded ammo. So I'm assuming that lots of residue is par for the course with the cartridge.
The main thing I've noticed about dirtyness is that .44 magnum seems to leave more powder residue in the chambers and in the barrel than does .44 special (in that same revolver), or than .357 magnum/.38 special in my other revolvers. I have the dies, brass, and primers for reloading .44 magnum, but no bullets yet, so almost everything I've fired through it to date (since 1996) has been commercially loaded ammo. So I'm assuming that lots of residue is par for the course with the cartridge.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
7075-T7
- Senior Member
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
- Location: Little Elm
Re: Issue with new S&W629
I did notice that .44mags are a little dirty compared to other rounds. The rounds I've fired in my Ruger Alaskan .44magnum do leave some residue, but nothing I couldn't get off with my usual cleaning products, the S&W was a different story. Though, the ruger has a .003-.004" gap instead of the .007-.014" of the 629.
Taking a closer look at the 629, the gap at the top of the forcing cone was larger than the bottom while still being larger on the left than the right
Oh well, it was delivered at Smith this morning, we'll see how that goes.
Taking a closer look at the 629, the gap at the top of the forcing cone was larger than the bottom while still being larger on the left than the right
Oh well, it was delivered at Smith this morning, we'll see how that goes.
- cbunt1
- Senior Member
- Posts: 812
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:48 pm
- Location: NW Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: Issue with new S&W629
Being only an "armchair amateur" gunsmith, it sounds exactly like a slightly bent crane as mentioned above. The good news is that it's about a 5-minute fix once it makes it to a smith's bench.
Since you sent it to S&W, you'll be happy with the result. From what I'm told, their procedure with any gun shipped to them is to fully strip it, and check everything, verify and bring into spec all the fits and adjustments.
When you get it back, it should be better than a new off-the-shelf 629!
Let us know how it works out!
Since you sent it to S&W, you'll be happy with the result. From what I'm told, their procedure with any gun shipped to them is to fully strip it, and check everything, verify and bring into spec all the fits and adjustments.
When you get it back, it should be better than a new off-the-shelf 629!
Let us know how it works out!
American by birth, Texan by the grace of God!
-
7075-T7
- Senior Member
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:13 am
- Location: Little Elm
Re: Issue with new S&W629
Well, I got the revolver back a week or so after S&W got it.
Install new BBL.
Replace Yoke screw.
The gap looks better and measured very similarly to my Alaskan (.005-.006) so assuming she shoots ok, I'll be happy. One oddity, the grip on the revolver was installed completely wrong, as in, I could see through the frame with about a 1/3" gap. I put it together correctly and it's fine, but still odd
Install new BBL.
Replace Yoke screw.
The gap looks better and measured very similarly to my Alaskan (.005-.006) so assuming she shoots ok, I'll be happy. One oddity, the grip on the revolver was installed completely wrong, as in, I could see through the frame with about a 1/3" gap. I put it together correctly and it's fine, but still odd
-
RECIT
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
- Location: Sugar Land, TX
Re: Issue with new S&W629 - Update
Makes you wonder who repaired the cylinder if they can't install the grips correctly.
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
- AEA
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5110
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Issue with new S&W629 - Update
Musta' been a late Friday afternoon, or early Monday morning!RECIT wrote:Makes you wonder who repaired the cylinder if they can't install the grips correctly.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
-
texasmusic
- Senior Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Katy
Re: Issue with new S&W629 - Update
Union workersRECIT wrote:Makes you wonder who repaired the cylinder if they can't install the grips correctly.
Ubi libertas habitat ibi nostra patria est
-
old farmer
- Senior Member
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:00 am
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Issue with new S&W629 - Update
I have own several S&W weopons.
FYI
http://www.chuckhawks.com/smith-wesson_dark.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
God Bliss America.