The other decision

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
rwg3
Senior Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:07 am

The other decision

Post by rwg3 »

So in an effort to get ready for summer vacation, the court issued it's decision on the Stolen Valor law. In a 6-3 decision the court sided with the power of free speech, regardless of the truth of the speech. While it is reprehensible that one would lie about military service, the preservation of free speech is important to us all, especially in these forums.
"Moderation is the silken string running through the pearl-chain of all virtues", Thomas Fuller
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: The other decision

Post by The Annoyed Man »

rwg3 wrote:So in an effort to get ready for summer vacation, the court issued it's decision on the Stolen Valor law. In a 6-3 decision the court sided with the power of free speech, regardless of the truth of the speech. While it is reprehensible that one would lie about military service, the preservation of free speech is important to us all, especially in these forums.
I don't have a problem with that, so long as A) the liars are exposed as liars, and B) their lies do not cost anyone except themselves any loss of funds, property, or reputation. So the flip side of that ought to be the freedom to call a bald-faced liar a "bald-faced liar" whenever he or she tells bald-faced lies about a phony military career and/or medals and exploits.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
The Mad Moderate
Senior Member
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:31 am
Location: Marble Falls

Re: The other decision

Post by The Mad Moderate »

This is one of those where I agree with the court but strongly wish there was some way to publicly shame them. On this same topic could someone elaborate on Rush Limbaughs comments that the court legalized pedophilia with this ruling. :confused5 :headscratch http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201206280010" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Please forgive the MM4A link.
American by birth Texan by the grace of God

Not to be a republican at twenty is proof of want of heart; to be one at thirty is proof of want of head.
-Francois Guisot
User avatar
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: The other decision

Post by VMI77 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
rwg3 wrote:So in an effort to get ready for summer vacation, the court issued it's decision on the Stolen Valor law. In a 6-3 decision the court sided with the power of free speech, regardless of the truth of the speech. While it is reprehensible that one would lie about military service, the preservation of free speech is important to us all, especially in these forums.
I don't have a problem with that, so long as A) the liars are exposed as liars, and B) their lies do not cost anyone except themselves any loss of funds, property, or reputation. So the flip side of that ought to be the freedom to call a bald-faced liar a "bald-faced liar" whenever he or she tells bald-faced lies about a phony military career and/or medals and exploits.
For B they should be prosecuted fraud, theft by fraud, libel, or slander.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: The other decision

Post by The Annoyed Man »

VMI77 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
rwg3 wrote:So in an effort to get ready for summer vacation, the court issued it's decision on the Stolen Valor law. In a 6-3 decision the court sided with the power of free speech, regardless of the truth of the speech. While it is reprehensible that one would lie about military service, the preservation of free speech is important to us all, especially in these forums.
I don't have a problem with that, so long as A) the liars are exposed as liars, and B) their lies do not cost anyone except themselves any loss of funds, property, or reputation. So the flip side of that ought to be the freedom to call a bald-faced liar a "bald-faced liar" whenever he or she tells bald-faced lies about a phony military career and/or medals and exploits.
For B they should be prosecuted fraud, theft by fraud, libel, or slander.
No argument from me.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
bigbang
Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: The other decision

Post by bigbang »

The same should apply to people who lie on their resumes and defraud companies that hire them.
This is a Glock 40. Fifty Cent. Too Short. All of them talk about a Glock 40. OK?
I'm the only one in this forum fool enough - that I know of - to shoot himself with a Glock 40.
User avatar
RSJ
Senior Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:18 am
Location: North Dallas

Re: The other decision

Post by RSJ »

In my opinion the conduct in this case is no different than the Westboro Baptist Church protesting soldiers funerals. I hate it and openly voice my opinion against it, but I understand the Supreme Court's reasoning.
NRA Member
User avatar
hi-power
Senior Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: The other decision

Post by hi-power »

I heard about this site on the radio earlier this week. I guess they receive requests to verify the story of people who claim to have won medals or say they belonged to elite service groups. In other words, they vet the vets. I don't know if they charge for this service, but there is a donate button on their home page.
http://www.stolenvalor.com/
RHenriksen
Senior Member
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: Houston

Re: The other decision

Post by RHenriksen »

hi-power wrote:I heard about this site on the radio earlier this week. I guess they receive requests to verify the story of people who claim to have won medals or say they belonged to elite service groups. In other words, they vet the vets. I don't know if they charge for this service, but there is a donate button on their home page.
http://www.stolenvalor.com/
Perhaps this site could also include a section for people known to have acted fraudulently w/respect to their claims of past military service?
I'll quit carrying a gun when they make murder and armed robbery illegal

Houston Technology Consulting
soup-to-nuts IT infrastructure design, deployment, and support for SMBs
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: The other decision

Post by Kythas »

VMI77 wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
rwg3 wrote:So in an effort to get ready for summer vacation, the court issued it's decision on the Stolen Valor law. In a 6-3 decision the court sided with the power of free speech, regardless of the truth of the speech. While it is reprehensible that one would lie about military service, the preservation of free speech is important to us all, especially in these forums.
I don't have a problem with that, so long as A) the liars are exposed as liars, and B) their lies do not cost anyone except themselves any loss of funds, property, or reputation. So the flip side of that ought to be the freedom to call a bald-faced liar a "bald-faced liar" whenever he or she tells bald-faced lies about a phony military career and/or medals and exploits.
For B they should be prosecuted fraud, theft by fraud, libel, or slander.
They are. There's one person who has, for the last 12 years, been running a training academy for his local law enforcement and security company employees. He listed as his credentials for his expertise that he was a retired Special Forces light colonel. His fraud was found out and he was sentenced to 21 months in prison and must pay back every student or organization who ever paid for a class at his company.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
User avatar
Paragrouper
Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:47 pm
Location: Shady Shores, TX

Re: The other decision

Post by Paragrouper »

Kythas wrote:They are. There's one person who has, for the last 12 years, been running a training academy for his local law enforcement and security company employees. He listed as his credentials for his expertise that he was a retired Special Forces light colonel. His fraud was found out and he was sentenced to 21 months in prison and must pay back every student or organization who ever paid for a class at his company.
You would be speaking of William (Bill) Hillar. You can read about him at PS.COM http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/for ... hp?t=30904

While posers cannot be prosecuted for stolen valor alone, they can be prosecuted for other crimes, as was the case with this clown.
DCC
"Beware the fury of of the patient man." ~John Dryden
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”