Gun ban contingency plans

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Carry-a-Kimber
Senior Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:58 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by Carry-a-Kimber »

Does a belt fed semi-auto PKM fall into the "detachable 10 round magazine" category? :evil2:
It isn't designed to hold a detachable magazine at all.
Image
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by anygunanywhere »

Carry-a-Kimber wrote:Does a belt fed semi-auto PKM fall into the "detachable 10 round magazine" category? :evil2:
It isn't designed to hold a detachable magazine at all.
[ Image ]
As I recall belt fed weapons are included.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
fickman
Senior Member
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by fickman »

I'm still fairly new to rifles. . . so please bear with me:

Why would somebody prefer a rifle chambered in a handgun caliber (.357, .44, or .45 Colt) as opposed to a 30/30 or other rifle round?
Native Texian
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by Purplehood »

fickman wrote:I'm still fairly new to rifles. . . so please bear with me:

Why would somebody prefer a rifle chambered in a handgun caliber (.357, .44, or .45 Colt) as opposed to a 30/30 or other rifle round?
So you can use the rounds in a handgun or a rifle. Not knowing anything about ballistics, I would imagine that it would be a very short-ranged rifle.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by gigag04 »

fickman wrote:I'm still fairly new to rifles. . . so please bear with me:

Why would somebody prefer a rifle chambered in a handgun caliber (.357, .44, or .45 Colt) as opposed to a 30/30 or other rifle round?
A caliber in a rifle platform will generally allow a person to be more accurate than the same caliber used in a handgun platform due to a more stable interface, higher muzzle velocity (longer barrel), and longer sight radius.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
fickman
Senior Member
Posts: 1711
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:52 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by fickman »

gigag04 wrote:
fickman wrote:I'm still fairly new to rifles. . . so please bear with me:

Why would somebody prefer a rifle chambered in a handgun caliber (.357, .44, or .45 Colt) as opposed to a 30/30 or other rifle round?
A caliber in a rifle platform will generally allow a person to be more accurate than the same caliber used in a handgun platform due to a more stable interface, higher muzzle velocity (longer barrel), and longer sight radius.
I understand that the same round would be more effective (faster, more accurate) coming out of a rifle than a handgun.

But if you're looking to buy a rifle, why would somebody choose a rifle chambered in a handgun caliber? Is it just for the convenience of buying one caliber for both pistols and rifles? Cost of ammo? Any other reason?

Without knowing more than I do, if I was looking at a lever action carbine, I'd be inclined to buy a .30-30 instead of one of the pistol calibers.

Just wondering if I'm missing something else.
Native Texian
User avatar
A-R
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by A-R »

As said, it's so you can share ammo across platforms. It's sort of an extreme idea, bordering on survivalist mentality and with roots in Old West lore, but the idea is if you lose your handgun you are still able to run your handgun ammo through your rifle in an emergency (or vise versa). This is why pistol-caliber carbines that utilize pistol magazines like the Kel Tec sub2000 and Beretta PX4 Storm are such hot sellers despite much better rifle-caliber semi-auto long guns being available
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26889
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by The Annoyed Man »

A-R wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Chris wrote:I own a few WWII era Enfields. For bolt action rifles with ten round magazines, they can sustain a very fast rate of accurate fire. And not a lot of people are taking 303 British off the shelves.
Ruger Gunsite Scout, .308 Winchester, 10 round removable box magazine, 1.5-5x33mm Leupold Scout Scope. Not the same caliber, but a handy bolt rifle in a battle rifle caliber.
TAM, that's an interesting alternative I hadn't considered. Wonder which action I could learn to work faster - bolt or lever?

I love the .308 round, but it does suffer - like 5.56/.223 - from the current ammo insanity with all the M1 and AR-10 clone buyers hoarding it.
Well, I've got a few hundred rounds of .308 on hand, and enough bullets in varying weights/types to load another 400 or so. I have thousands of cases and primers, and enough powder for about another 1300 rounds. I have a ton of handgun brass and primers, but only enough powder for a few hundred rounds, and no bullets on hand at all.....although I've got 230 odd pounds of lead ingots on hand if I want to cast my own. I just got complacent and didn't build up a bullet and powder supply while I had the chance. If I have the opportunity to remedy that, it will be one of the first things I do.

As to cycling speed, I'm sure you can cycle a lever sightly faster than a bolt, and the lever gun would be more useful in CQB, but on the other hand, the bolt gun's effective range is a lot further than the lever rifle's, and if everything works out just so, you won't have to cycle the bolt that fast because you'll be laying down steady, careful, aimed fire at anything inside of 800 yards.
:mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by baldeagle »

The 30-30 Winchester has a muzzle velocity of roughly 2300 fps. reference. The .357 Mag has a muzzle velocity of roughly 1900 fps in an 18" barrel. reference (Barrel length is not mentioned in the 30-30 page. I assume it refers to a "typical" rifle barrel length of 18-20 inches.) So while the 30-30 has a higher muzzle velocity, the .357 Mag doesn't lag that far behind. Within a "normal" range of say 400 yards, both would be lethal.

The muzzle velocity of the .308 Winchester with a 24" barrel is roughly 2700 fps. reference. It's likely the muzzle velocity wouldn't be much decreased at 20 or even 18 inches. reference.

So while a lever action "short" barrel rifle shooting a pistol caliber will give up some long range capability, at the distances that most people would be shooting them accurately, they'll be just as lethal as a rifle caliber.

.308 Winchester will cost you about 50% more than .357 Mag. 30-30 Winchester more than twice as much.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar
Iunnrais
Senior Member
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:32 am
Location: Houston

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by Iunnrais »

12+1 in a 24" Rossi 92 doesn't hurt the equation either (or 10+1 in the 20") :fire
bagman45
Banned
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:20 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by bagman45 »

Folks, this will only happen if We The People allow it to. Let's stop talking about how we sneak around behind our parent's back (the gubbmint), and start talking about how we keep it from happening. Call and email your representatives EVERY DAY. Flood the phones and email boxes of ALL Senators and House members. They DO pay attention to these things; remember, they want to get re-elected.... If you don't say anything, they figure you don't care, and will do what is most politically expedient for them..... :tiphat:
User avatar
9mmfan
Senior Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:08 am
Location: Weatherford

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by 9mmfan »

my contingency plan would be to sit on the arms/ammo I currently have, while still practicing in a fashion that maximizes said amount I am sitting on. I also need to finish my reloading education, happy that I bought the press and some components a smidge ago. Just in case it really goes down, I just; and I mean only moments ago, ordered the Uberti 1860 Army I have wanted for a while. Also a bullet mould to go with it. Obviously, I chose to be paranoid with style. In addition to the work gloves I keep in the glove box(!) of the 4Runner, I have to find a proper slapping glove to initiate honor-bound duels. :lol:
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition
-Rudyard Kipling
koconcept
Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:30 am

Re: Gun ban contingency plans

Post by koconcept »

I've been waiting patiently for someone to come out with a .500 sw magnum lever action rifle. OH yea you know you wanna put that in a rifle and find out just what how it will perform. Im more interested in it as a rifle than a handgun. Firing the handgun seems to be a exercise of self abuse.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”