Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar
Medic624
Senior Member
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:56 pm
Location: Pearland

Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by Medic624 »

http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2013/jan/ ... z2IFw2PRa0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is in a small(ish) town in western WA State less than 10K ppl. (I used to live there) 1st...I'm glad no one was hurt in this incident. 2nd...The story doesn't state if he was a CHL holder but I would imagine if he wasn't he would have also been charged for not having one while carrying concealed. With the provided info... Do you believe this to be negligent and IYHO should he have been charged? He probably should have had a holster BUT a lot of ppl carry a BUG in a pocket. What's your take? Just curious.
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam (AMDG)
It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.
George Washington
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by Keith B »

Medic624 wrote:http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2013/jan/ ... z2IFw2PRa0

This is in a small(ish) town in western WA State less than 10K ppl. (I used to live there) 1st...I'm glad no one was hurt in this incident. 2nd...The story doesn't state if he was a CHL holder but I would imagine if he wasn't he would have also been charged for not having one while carrying concealed. With the provided info... Do you believe this to be negligent and IYHO should he have been charged? He probably should have had a holster BUT a lot of ppl carry a BUG in a pocket. What's your take? Just curious.
Sounds like there is more to the story than is in the article. It does say he tried to cover up the ND by saying the noise was a balloon popping. I am thinking he may have been trying to get away without taking accountability for his actions and that may have lead to the charges vs. cooperating and trying to do what was right.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
Medic624
Senior Member
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 4:56 pm
Location: Pearland

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by Medic624 »

Keith B wrote:
Medic624 wrote:http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2013/jan/ ... z2IFw2PRa0

This is in a small(ish) town in western WA State less than 10K ppl. (I used to live there) 1st...I'm glad no one was hurt in this incident. 2nd...The story doesn't state if he was a CHL holder but I would imagine if he wasn't he would have also been charged for not having one while carrying concealed. With the provided info... Do you believe this to be negligent and IYHO should he have been charged? He probably should have had a holster BUT a lot of ppl carry a BUG in a pocket. What's your take? Just curious.
Sounds like there is more to the story than is in the article. It does say he tried to cover up the ND by saying the noise was a balloon popping. I am thinking he may have been trying to get away without taking accountability for his actions and that may have lead to the charges vs. cooperating and trying to do what was right.
Yeah, see I think it appears he was either embarrassed and panicked and tried to be dishonest or just plain trying to cover it up. Bottom line for me is he needed to be more cognizant of where his weapon was and how it was contained.
Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam (AMDG)
It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.
George Washington
User avatar
Maxwell
Senior Member
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:05 pm

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by Maxwell »

I fully agree that he needed to be much more aware of where the gun was so it didn't "fall out" of his pocket! When I pocket carry NOTHING goes in that poket not even my hand unless I am pulling the pistol out.

My second question is with regards to the handgun itself. I know none of mine will fire if dropped so what was he carrying that would?

:headscratch
I never let schooling interfere with my education. Mark Twain
K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by K.Mooneyham »

Maxwell wrote:I fully agree that he needed to be much more aware of where the gun was so it didn't "fall out" of his pocket! When I pocket carry NOTHING goes in that poket not even my hand unless I am pulling the pistol out.

My second question is with regards to the handgun itself. I know none of mine will fire if dropped so what was he carrying that would?

:headscratch
I keep wondering the same thing when I hear these stories. Just as a for instance, I read a book on the 1911 and the author addressed the tales that it was unsafe to carry one "cocked and locked" because it would "go off" if it was dropped. They ended up doing the test and found that it had to be dropped from over 10 feet high on a hard surface and land against the hammer to get it to fire, IIRC. I don't think I would want to carry a handgun that was prone to just "going off" if you dropped it out of your pocket. :eek6
User avatar
puma guy
Senior Member
Posts: 7937
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by puma guy »

Maxwell wrote:I fully agree that he needed to be much more aware of where the gun was so it didn't "fall out" of his pocket! When I pocket carry NOTHING goes in that poket not even my hand unless I am pulling the pistol out.

My second question is with regards to the handgun itself. I know none of mine will fire if dropped so what was he carrying that would?

:headscratch
Ditto on what was he carrying? The article only states a ".38 Special" which almost certainly is a revolver and not a pistol. There are few semi-auto pistols chambered for the .38 Special round. Of course the author may have mis-stated the facts. What are the chances of something like that occurring? :biggrinjester:
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
KRM45
Senior Member
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by KRM45 »

If your weapon discharges when you did not intend it to, and you didn't have it pointed in a safe direction, I would say you recklessly endangered people. I think the charges are appropriate. Let him have his day in court.
User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by Jumping Frog »

99.9% of revolvers are drop safe. S&W revolvers added the hammer block safety in 1944 and have been drop safe since then. Rugers have a transfer bar. Other modern revolvers are similarly designed to be drop safe.

Unless he is carrying around a really old revolver. my bull meter is twitching on the story.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
KRM45
Senior Member
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Man gets charged for dropping gun in Cost plus

Post by KRM45 »

It could have been an early LCP that never went back to Ruger for the recall. I debated on sending mine back, but the free magazine offer convinced me.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”