Geister wrote:NcongruNt wrote:If you're going to lump people into a group like that, all you're doing for them is alienating them.
I NEVER said that everyone in Austin is a gun hating liberal who votes straight Democrat.
What I DID say and imply is that the liberal crowd in Austin overshadows every other group there, which is why it's not my favorite city.
You made a blanket statement about the city - oh, except for the far west part, they're OK. You seemed to make the implication that we're mostly liberals who vote Democrat. Liberals (as you define them) only overshadow other groups in Austin because they're in the majority. As you also state, we voted for Kerry in the 2004 presidential elections. So yes, you're saying that most of Austin is made up of liberals who vote Democrat. Being that this is a gun forum and we're writing in a thread about an Austin paper and its editorialist's article regarding CHL privacy, the negative association with gun politics is already there.
By the way, you might want to take a look at the map of votes for Kerry again. Travis County is
not the only county to vote for Kerry. Most of the Rio Grande Valley, 2 counties in the west, and 1 in the east did as well. Here's the map:
Geister wrote:
NcongruNt wrote:
I'm not going to even approach the subject of what you consider "liberal" because it's nothing but a label and life isn't that simple.
I won't support liberals and anti-gun politicians in office. That sums it up.
This doesn't really clarify anything. I'm not really sure the point of that response.
Geister wrote:
NcongruNt wrote:
I voted for Kerry in the last presidential election. I didn't do it because I'm a Republican or Democrat - in fact, I'm registered as a Republican. I voted for him because he was more likely out of the only two viable candidates (and very poor candidates at that) available to bring a balance of power in the mess that is politics in Washington. I probably wouldn't vote for him again if he ran, for the very same reasons.
Sorry dude, but if you're voted Kerry and are proud if it, I can't really understand that at all. That pretty much conflicts with your statement that you are a proponent of the Second Amendment. Except for maybe the communist party presidental candidate, Kerry was the most anti-gun candidate out of everyone in the '04 presidential election.
The Gun Owner's of America gave Kerry a F for his voting record on gun issues. Ted Kennedy got a F-.
Perhaps you should consider voting for your BELIEFS, not trying to "swing" a balance of power in Washington. If Kerry was president right now, we would probably already have several new gun control laws in the books with the Democrat majority.
If you think politics is simply about beliefs, then perhaps you should read up on the subject a bit more. It's about power and influence. I didn't say I was particularly proud of voting for Kerry. As I stated previously, I thought both candidates were very poor choices. What I did know was that we had a president who got us into a war with no end on false pretenses. Given the choice between him and Kerry, I chose Kerry. As for your suggestion that he would have enacted a bunch of gun-grabbing legislation
when there got to be Democrat majority in Congress reiterates my point. The Democrats got Congress only because of the backlash caused by Bush's policies and the Republicans in Congress backing him. Had a balancing of power occurred by Kerry becoming President, the House and Senate would most likely have retained their Republican majority in the 2006 elections.