Can anyone verify this?
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp? ... 0502b.html
Atty General end run...
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
That article is fairly accurate. Take a look at this: http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/InTheNews.aspx?ID=9354
- Jim
- Jim
I agree. Not so much from this administration, but from a gun-grabber administration. I think it's a bad idea.stroo wrote:This one is worrisome if only because it is wide open for abuse.
I am highly suspicious of anything this guy tries to legislate.The article wrote:At the Justice Department's request, the bill was introduced last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), whom SAF describes as one of the most extreme anti-gunners in Congress.
This ought to stop it on the grounds of it being unconstitutional.The article wrote:There's also a larger concern, Gottlieb added: "When did we decide as a nation that it is a good idea to give a cabinet member the power to deny someone's constitutional right simply on suspicion, without a trial or anything approaching due process?"
- jimlongley
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
I doubt they are, but if they did try, it would be much better to allow the purchase to go through (and set off alarm bells when the instant check is called in) than it would be to block the sale and notify them at the gun counter that the government is watching them.gigag04 wrote:Are "real" terrorists really buying legally purchased and 4473'ed firearms?