Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.
MechAg94 wrote:They new rings and stop buying leupold?
Might retry the 4-12 on a mount with both rings on a single mount. Makes me wonder if the scope or mount has some built in elevation. Never had a scope get off that much sitting around without either getting banged up or being broken.
The rings and mount on the Model 70 are Redfield and are the same ones that I used to mount a 3-9 Leupold and have been on the rifle since 1994. I check it every year and never had to make any adjustments. I've shot deer with it every year from 60 -180 yards. It just sits in the safe waiting for deer season. I checked the screws for tightness at the range after the abominable performance.
MechAg94 wrote:The only other thing I can think of is to try a scope ring alignment kit if you can get access to one.
I installed a Zeiss 6.5-20 to replace the 4-12 Leupold and sent the scope back to Leupold today. I am going to hunt with the Ziess this year and maybe install the Leupold for next year. If Leupold rules out a defective scope and it still needs elevation adjustment I can shim it.
The Anschutz is just weird. Even though the rings are high quality for a groved receiver they may be for 3/8" grove instead of an 11mm grove. I'm installing a set of screw on bases and new rings as soon as I get them. If that doesn't do the trick I'll send the scope back to Bushnell which services B&L.
johncanfield wrote:Ammo problems? Scope mounting issues? I got very frustrated with my then new Bushmaster .308 - I was all over the target and thought the cross-hairs in the scope were jumping around so I bought a significantly better scope which did not significantly improve the situation.
After a lot of trial and error, the issues were:
Mounting rings were loosening up, used thread locker on rail bolts
I did not bias the mount to the front of the rail notches so recoil wouldn't pull the mounts aft
I was shooting different ammo expecting the same results (DOH

)
Shooter error - I was not keeping the butt-stock firmly held against my shoulder
Shooter error, not keeping the Bushmaster completely immobilized (carbine length barrel of course)
Shooter error, not smooth with trigger pull
Too much wobble in the stock Bushmaster butt-stock, replaced with a Magpul
The AR was shooting great last time I shot it and I'm using the same ammo.

Mounts and rings checked for tightness. The 6-24 Nikon target scope has parallax adjustment The rifle is a varmit model with EOP and weaver style Leupold quick mounts. I am going to move the rings to different points on the rail. I am shooting a Mag-Pul PRS stock, Hogue Aluminum Free Float Tube hand guard on a Cowan bench rest with the butt stock supported by a Protektor eared sand bag. The gun is stationary and basically I can just pull the trigger once I get the adjustments made on the bench rest. I can't completely rule out the things you pointed out (all good points), but this is the same set up I shot last time. Of course I may not have compensated for the curve of the earth
EDIT: I found an old target from last August for the AR-15. About a year and a half prior to the August group I had a 5 shot group that was a clover of 4 shots w/ 1 about a bullet diameter away at 7 o'clock from the group. That was the best group I'd ever shot with the rifle. I took a picture of the August 2012 and last week's target side by side for contrast. The target to the right is from last Wednesday. 100 yd from bench rest and the same lot of Lake City 55gr ammo The first shots at the top of the target were with bullseye POA. I started adjusting down until I ran out of elevation. The group of shots above the bulls eye are those adjustment shots. Next I shot at the bottom left diamond and started adjusting for windage. I them shot at the bottom right diamond. The last shots I took can be seen above the lower vertical bar and my POA was the bottom of the bar. The windage adjustments was fine though I pulled the shot high left that's out of the string. Investigation to continue at a later date.
