Why Do So Many Repost The Original Post?

[jmra]

jmra,

I made more mistakes than that alone.

No disrespect intended. Just having a little fun. 4 straight days watching cartoons with the kids is taking a toll.

[Abraham]

jmra,

Don't I know it!

I finally had to get out of the house so I went on a bike ride and then had to turn around halfway. It got raining too hard, plus I forgot my rain gear, but at least got in 11 miles before turning back.

[Jaguar]

Crossfire,
And since we're on the subject, is their any way I can enlist you to help slow the unbridled (I love that word) re-posting nonsense, that people now feel absolutely necessary with every post?

No, apparently not.

[Abraham]

Jaguar,

I wondered how long it would take before someone caught on.

Chuckle!!

[SATX-Scrub]

[Oldgringo]

I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.

Just to annoy you.

You beat me to it.

[bizarrenormality]

That's a good point.

[CHLLady]

Because after several pages, the original topic gets lost.

[MasterOfNone]

But, for some apparently, that's to easy...

"Too easy" not "to easy"
Now back to my room before Crossfire catches me.

Can't a user edit his own posts? In this case, if Abraham corrects his misuse of the word "to", then everyone will wonder "What the heck was jmra talking about?"

[Syntyr]

Because after several pages, the original topic gets lost.

That's obviously the case with some of us SQUIERREL!!! Umm where was I Oh yeah those of us who are a little more easily distracted!

[Topbuilder]

Because after several pages, the original topic gets lost.

Sometimes in the first page. Not that that would happen here, of course...

[jmra]

But, for some apparently, that's to easy...

"Too easy" not "to easy"
Now back to my room before Crossfire catches me.

Can't a user edit his own posts? In this case, if Abraham corrects his misuse of the word "to", then everyone will wonder "What the heck was jmra talking about?"

Everybody wonders what the heck JMRA is talking about all the time anyway.

[Abraham]

jmra,

That's beautiful!

But, only a meager 3 re-posts in 1 response?

Heck, our more generous brothers and sisters like to stack 5 or 6 re-posts per response that ultimately have no meaning whatsoever.

When I see this peculiar phenomenon, I'm reminded of scat jazz singing...

[sjfcontrol]

Crossfire,
And since we're on the subject, is their any way I can enlist you to help slow the unbridled (I love that word) re-posting nonsense, that people now feel absolutely necessary with every post?

No, apparently not.

Suffering a little cabin fever of your own, Crossfire?

[DocV]

I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.

Just to annoy you.

You beat me to it.

Everybody beat me to it