flintknapper wrote: Prayers for the deputy and his family.
Apparently, the weapon was taken from the deputy during the course of a struggle. The weapon was not "snatched" from him unawares. So, clearly "open carry" is not an issue in this case.....and I suspect you know that too.
All I know is what was in the article I posted.
Sure there was some kind of struggle going on. In this case, the cop was pressing the issue trying to make the arrest. But a struggle is a struggle once it starts. It is no less a struggle if it starts because some whacko tries to snatch someone's openly carried gun.
flintknapper wrote: Unless you can cite authenticated cases of ordinary citizens (from open carry states) that have had their weapons taken and used against them.....then I remain unimpressed with your assertion.
Then remain unimpressed.
But I'll put it bluntly, so there's no mistaking what I am saying here. The reason examples of "snatching" from non-LEO's are hard to come by is because
very few of them are stupid enough to carry openly in the wide variety of places where there would be a significant risk.
Why do you think prison guards don't carry when they are "interacting" with the prisoners?
If you think that there is no added risk of snatching from giving up tactical sursprise by carrying openly, then you go ahead and think that.
flintknapper wrote: It does point to one very real need however: Training in weapons retention....and some rudimentary hand to hand skills for those physically capable.
Even if you "start" with your weapon concealed, if the need arises to draw that weapon and you are within 0-10 feet of a determined BG... you might still be disarmed.
Training is always a good idea.
flintknapper wrote: Yes, there will always be the occasional nutcase/brazen/unstable...etc person that would attempt "an open carry snatch of your weapon". But until you prove to me that it happens in appreciable numbers, then I think an open carry "option" would be of benefit to many of us.
Just another opinion.
1) I don't have to prove anything.
2) You might think it is a "benefit", but unlike me you have offerred
ZERO in the way of logic or facts as to the nature of that benefit or where it comes from. All I been able to glean so far is that you seem to like the idea of open carry.
Unfortunately, I don't really
care, if you like open carry, or if you want the right to do it in TX. FWIW, if it was on the table, I would support it.
It ain't my problem if someone gets their darn fool head blown off.
3) Here are the tradeoffs:
Benefits of open carry:
Faster draw and presentation
Possible deterrent factor
Drawbacks of open carry:
Loss of tactical surprise
Increased opportunities for "snatching"
You can think whatever you want, but to me,
giving up tactical surprise is HUGE. It can make you the first one shot. Your chances of ambushing the BG or BG's are greatly reduced. Their chances of ambushing
YOU are greatly increased.
I think it greatly overbalances any minor advantage from being able to draw more quickly. (Time it. I can draw from a concealment garment and get off a shot in right around 2 seconds. Without the concealment garment, I can take about a half to three fourths of a second off of that. Note that the above was NOT accomplished using a retention holster. I don't own one, but I believe it would be a little slower.)
Because most people are endowed with good sense, the number of people (non-LEO's) carrying openly in crowded, urban environments is minimal. So there is little data available.
The one population group that
DOES carry openly in large numbers in these environments is cops. And there's a lot of data on how they fare. Like the Providence, RI detective that I mentioned in another thread,
they sometimes get shot with their own guns, after those guns have been snatched by some dirtball they were in the presence of.
Note: There was no struggle going on when this happened. The detective was questioning a suspect in a room at Prov. PD HQ when the suspect ambushed him, overpowered him (he was much larger), snatched his gun, and shot him dead.