In the article, a quote by an ATF agent baffles me:
What does that even mean? We shouldn't have innovation in firearms? It seems certainly obvious that he knows this stuff is satire, does he really think this stuff is going to birth some sort of "creative weapons" movement? It also dumbfounds me that he seems to find 100,000 hits to someone's attempt at humor disturbing."It puts ideas in people's heads," Dunham said. "We don't need any more creative weapons than there are."
