Sights for an alternate shooting stance

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

NcongruNt
Senior Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:44 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by NcongruNt »

Wow. I can't believe anyone took this seriously.

In the article, a quote by an ATF agent baffles me:
"It puts ideas in people's heads," Dunham said. "We don't need any more creative weapons than there are."
What does that even mean? We shouldn't have innovation in firearms? It seems certainly obvious that he knows this stuff is satire, does he really think this stuff is going to birth some sort of "creative weapons" movement? It also dumbfounds me that he seems to find 100,000 hits to someone's attempt at humor disturbing. :roll:
pbandjelly

Post by pbandjelly »

Mithras61 wrote: I find their lack of a sense of humor almost as entertaining as the original joke! :smilelol5:
seems to be a lot of that goin' around...
Venus Pax
Senior Member
Posts: 3147
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: SE Texas

Post by Venus Pax »

NcongruNt wrote:Wow. I can't believe anyone took this seriously.

In the article, a quote by an ATF agent baffles me:
"It puts ideas in people's heads," Dunham said. "We don't need any more creative weapons than there are."
What does that even mean? We shouldn't have innovation in firearms? It seems certainly obvious that he knows this stuff is satire, does he really think this stuff is going to birth some sort of "creative weapons" movement? It also dumbfounds me that he seems to find 100,000 hits to someone's attempt at humor disturbing. :roll:
Without weapons innovations, would we have been successful in World War II?
"If a man breaks in your house, he ain't there for iced tea." Mom & Dad.

The NRA & TSRA are a bargain; they're much cheaper than the cold, dead hands experience.
User avatar
Liberty
Senior Member
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Post by Liberty »

NcongruNt wrote:Wow. I can't believe anyone took this seriously.

In the article, a quote by an ATF agent baffles me:
"It puts ideas in people's heads," Dunham said. "We don't need any more creative weapons than there are."
What does that even mean? We shouldn't have innovation in firearms? It seems certainly obvious that he knows this stuff is satire, does he really think this stuff is going to birth some sort of "creative weapons" movement? It also dumbfounds me that he seems to find 100,000 hits to someone's attempt at humor disturbing. :roll:
It strikes me as surprising that anyone wold expect normal reasoning from someone in the ATF. These folks don't have any reputation as reasoning human beings.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”