...without the ability to choose whom they serve, then a business should also have to allow anyone to carry at their business too. No exceptions. Why? Well, the argument is that sexual preference is an intrinsic, immutable part of a person, and therefore it's the equivalent of other personal characteristics protected under the law like gender, race, etc. But the choice to carry a firearm is not an intrinsic, unchangeable part of a person, right? Right. Well, I would have agreed with that position until yesterday. I found out that it's a liberal meme that anyone who carries a firearm for self-defense is an "ammosexual". See these links:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/06/0 ... mmosexuals" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://twitter.com/hashtag/ammosexual" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017200618" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(click at your own risk)
Again, the argument is that who or what someone is sexually attracted to is an intrinsic, immutable part of a person. So if they're going to claim that about us and firearms, then let's just follow their argument to the logical conclusion and demand our rights as Ammosexual-Americans. Find a flaw in my logic.
