Yes, I saw that too.ScooterSissy wrote:I noticed the much-maligned Rep Strickland called the point of order on the time.
House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Let's see what my Representative does here.  Not sounding good just right now...
			
			
									
						
							A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition
-Rudyard Kipling
			
						-Rudyard Kipling
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Thought this was an up or down vote. Why did he yield
			
			
									
						
							NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member

			
						TSRA-Life member

Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
I thought the Aryan Nation was considered a criminal street gang.
			
			
									
						
							A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition
-Rudyard Kipling
			
						-Rudyard Kipling
- 
				Aggie_engr
- Senior Member
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:22 pm
- Location: The Woodlands, TX
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
This all seems like for political show. I think they know it's going to pass anyway.
			
			
									
						
										
						- 
				ScooterSissy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
The whole scenario is a total exaggeration. There's nothing in the bill that says a policeman has to "sit across the street and do nothing". It's pretty simple, if there's any reason for a policeman to feel suspicious, all he has to do is walk over, watching the weapon, and strike up a conversation. A good policeman can direct the conversation in a way that strengthens or weakens suspicions.9mmfan wrote:I thought the Aryan Nation was considered a criminal street gang.
There's noting in the amendment that says they "can't approach them at all".
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
It is an up or down vote, meaning there can be no amendments. It doesn't prohibit debate.RPBrown wrote:Thought this was an up or down vote. Why did he yield
Chas.
- der Teufel
- Senior Member
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:31 pm
- Location: In the vicinity of Austin
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
ScooterSissy wrote: The whole scenario is a total exaggeration. There's nothing in the bill that says a policeman has to "sit across the street and do nothing". It's pretty simple, if there's any reason for a policeman to feel suspicious, all he has to do is walk over, watching the weapon, and strike up a conversation. A good policeman can direct the conversation in a way that strengthens or weakens suspicions.
There's noting in the amendment that says they "can't approach them at all".
Yeah, I thought that was made pretty clear during the Senate debate.
A man can never have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition. — Rudyard Kipling 
NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Life Member
			
						NRA Endowment Member
TSRA Life Member
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
hmm, that sounds like a supporter now arguing to go to conference.
			
			
									
						
										
						- sugar land dave
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 12:03 am
- Location: Sugar Land, TX
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
The police most often arrive after things have occurred.  It is a sadly wry joke: 911 - when seconds count help is just minutes away.  Lets get this thing passed!
			
			
									
						
							DPS Received Forms- 1/18/11    Online Status - 1/27/11           My Mailbox - 2/12/11
NRA Life Member
			
						NRA Life Member
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
I would be OK with it going to conference if it weren't for the fact that it will get killed via filibuster in the senate.jerry_r60 wrote:hmm, that sounds like a supporter now arguing to go to conference.
Huffines may be partly to blame, but this bill being tied up for weeks due to a conflict between the chambers is the real culprit.
"All bleeding eventually stops.......quit whining!"
			
						Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Stickland is an ass and goes about things the wrong way.  I agree with his message, and he's definitely passionate.
			
			
													
					Last edited by txyaloo on Wed May 27, 2015 5:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
									
			
						
										
						Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
Rodney Ellis @RodneyEllis 4m4 minutes ago
Drinking the tea w/ @KonniBurton, @electcharles, @VanTaylorTX, @DonHuffines, @SenBobHall #txlege
https://twitter.com/RodneyEllis/status/ ... 20/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

					Last edited by NotRPB on Wed May 27, 2015 5:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
									
			
						
										
						- G.A. Heath
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2987
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
- Location: Western Texas
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
canvasbck wrote:I would be OK with it going to conference if it weren't for the fact that it will get killed via filibuster in the senate.jerry_r60 wrote:hmm, that sounds like a supporter now arguing to go to conference.
Huffines may be partly to blame, but this bill being tied up for weeks due to a conflict between the chambers is the real culprit.

How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
			
						R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
Re: House 5/27 - HB910 or SB11
My God this whole process is sooo confusing.  So it can go to conference, fail to come out, and then they can revote?  
			
			
									
						
										
						







