Kimbers newest 1911.

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar
Liberty
Senior Member
Posts: 6343
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Galveston
Contact:

Post by Liberty »

AEA wrote:I don't think I need one of those. I do not like the rear sight (although I understand the use of it). I have a BUG for situations that sight was designed for.

After all, how many rounds are you actually going to fire before it is over one way or the other?
Don't most 1911'a lock open when the last shot is fired? Its about a gun malfunction not a reloading issue. I think this is an "in the case of failure" fix. Maybe this is their solution with reliability issues. Kimber also has grooved sights on some of their guns.

I got to thinking about this though. It occoured to me that this was designed with Californian LEOs in mind. I but they run around uncharged. Makes sense. They would be more concerened about not being able to to cock the darned thing for the first shot. Being designed for undercover LEOs this gun might even be expected to be carried without holster.
Liberty''s Blog
"Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Post by AEA »

Understood......

And Yes, a 1911 will lock open after the last round is fired (if the Mag is still in the gun). Why do I say that? One tactical reloading technique is to change mags with the last round still in the chamber (that way if necessary during the change you can still get a round off).

But my BUG will solve the problem of malfunction OR reloading issues.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
biblefreak
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:13 am
Location: West Texas

Post by biblefreak »

AEA wrote:I don't think I need one of those. I do not like the rear sight (although I understand the use of it). I have a BUG for situations that sight was designed for.

After all, how many rounds are you actually going to fire before it is over one way or the other?:fire

I'll stick with my Kimber Stainless Pro Carry II (series 1) and my Kimbers UCII and Eclipse II (both series 2).
I don't need to buy every gun that is available. :shock: :grin:

One interesting thing though is they have gone back to series 1 ejector (internal) on this pistol! :grin:
Ah, but need and want are two very different creatures!!! :grin:
KBCraig
Banned
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Post by KBCraig »

I don't care for the stylized slide serrations. Looks like "kinder, gentler" SS lightning bolts, something the LAPD SIS has already been under fire for using.
User avatar
RubenZ
Member
Posts: 197
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:05 am
Location: Rio Grande Valley
Contact:

Post by RubenZ »

Total waste of money.


1,000.00 dollars just because it has SIS on the slide and probably 100.00 worth of upgrades :)
Thane
Senior Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Contact:

Post by Thane »

AEA wrote:One interesting thing though is they have gone back to series 1 style extractor (internal) on this pistol! :grin:
Kimber gave up on the external extractor a couple years ago; too many folks were having problems with it that just simply wouldn't go away, and they were losing customers. All of their pistols have the internal extractor now.
Image
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Post by AEA »

Yes, I just purchased a NEW Stainless Pro Carry II that indeed has the internal extractor. Glad to see it back!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”