Page 2 of 2

Re: Penetrating hard cover...is it necessary?

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:56 pm
by ghostrider
However, when I gauge probabilities, I personally think the chance of shooting an FMJ so that it penetrates and wounds a bystander is higher than the probability that I will need to shoot an FMJ through cover to save my life. Thus, I'll stick with well-designed hollow points for the best change to stop the threat.
Same here.

Besides, car doors are hard cover only in Hollywood :-0

But 2 car doors may be enough:
http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/buickot3.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Penetrating hard cover...is it necessary?

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:46 am
by flechero
I don't consider it when loading my carry gun.

I think LEO's have a much higher chance of needing that capability and most of them use good modern defensive ammo. Incidentally much of the modern defensive stuff is barricade/glass/car door tested so it will address almost all of the possible needs I would have for it. Besides, in a 9mm or .45acp, I have to think that if the cover will stop a good HP then it will likely stop a FMJ- or keep it from doing much on the other side.