Only if you're buying it for self-defense... Some people get guns just to have fun on the range, and reliability doesn't much matter for that role.SigM4 wrote:So is this supposed to make us forget about not one but two failed releases of the R51? I'm sure some unknowing folks will buy one, but anyone with half a brain would be wise to steer clear.
BREAKING: Remington Finally Introduces RP9 and RP45 Striker-Fired Handgun
Moderator: carlson1
-
Dave2
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3167
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: BREAKING: Remington Finally Introduces RP9 and RP45 Striker-Fired Handgun
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
-
MechAg94
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1584
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm
Re: BREAKING: Remington Finally Introduces RP9 and RP45 Striker-Fired Handgun
Most of my guns are just for having fun at the range, but if they don't work, I don't like them. That is the first requirement of a firearm, to work. This is especially true for polymer high capacity pistols.Dave2 wrote:Only if you're buying it for self-defense... Some people get guns just to have fun on the range, and reliability doesn't much matter for that role.SigM4 wrote:So is this supposed to make us forget about not one but two failed releases of the R51? I'm sure some unknowing folks will buy one, but anyone with half a brain would be wise to steer clear.