"Invited" Open Carry on Private Property

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

"Invited" Open Carry on Private Property

Post by mr surveyor »

I think the open carry, by the owner / legal occupant, on private property has been well covered. I am curious about a different situation. I will use my own locale and normal circumstances (as well as those of most of my running buddy's) as example:

My property is outside the corporate city limits of "small town" Texas, and I am having a "gathering" for something like a crawfish boil .... no wait, it's Fall, so a Dove grilling. All of the invited guests are "o.k.'d" to carry their hand gun of choice, OWB and uncovered. For what it's worth, the neighbors would not care, if they even noticed. Would any of my guests be in violation of any laws by doing this?
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 17788
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: "Invited" Open Carry on Private Property

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

mr surveyor wrote:I think the open carry, by the owner / legal occupant, on private property has been well covered. I am curious about a different situation. I will use my own locale and normal circumstances (as well as those of most of my running buddy's) as example:

My property is outside the corporate city limits of "small town" Texas, and I am having a "gathering" for something like a crawfish boil .... no wait, it's Fall, so a Dove grilling. All of the invited guests are "o.k.'d" to carry their hand gun of choice, OWB and uncovered. For what it's worth, the neighbors would not care, if they even noticed. Would any of my guests be in violation of any laws by doing this?
Yes. A Dove grilling isn't an exception to the general prohibition in TPC §46.02. If your guests are not CHL's, then they would violate TPC §46.02. If they are CHL's, then they would violate TPC §46.035(a) by intentionally failing to conceal.

Chas.
frankie_the_yankee
Banned
Posts: 2173
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:24 pm
Location: Smithville, TX

Post by frankie_the_yankee »

Now if you invited them to engage in target shooting as part of the day's festivities I think they would be OK to carry openly, CHL or not.
Ahm jus' a Southern boy trapped in a Yankee's body
mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts: 1919
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

Post by mr surveyor »

Thank you both! No arguments from me. :smile:
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
Renegade

Post by Renegade »

TXI said it best, you cannot give them permission to carry, but you can give them control of your premises.
User avatar
RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts: 5069
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: "Invited" Open Carry on Private Property

Post by RPBrown »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
mr surveyor wrote:I think the open carry, by the owner / legal occupant, on private property has been well covered. I am curious about a different situation. I will use my own locale and normal circumstances (as well as those of most of my running buddy's) as example:

My property is outside the corporate city limits of "small town" Texas, and I am having a "gathering" for something like a crawfish boil .... no wait, it's Fall, so a Dove grilling. All of the invited guests are "o.k.'d" to carry their hand gun of choice, OWB and uncovered. For what it's worth, the neighbors would not care, if they even noticed. Would any of my guests be in violation of any laws by doing this?
Yes. A Dove grilling isn't an exception to the general prohibition in TPC §46.02. If your guests are not CHL's, then they would violate TPC §46.02. If they are CHL's, then they would violate TPC §46.035(a) by intentionally failing to conceal.

Chas.
Charles, although I agree with you, how do ranges that have IDPA get by with allowing open carry. Would this not fall under the same restrictions?
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
Lucky45
Senior Member
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:29 pm
Location: Missouri City, TX
Contact:

Re: "Invited" Open Carry on Private Property

Post by Lucky45 »

RPBrown wrote:Charles, although I agree with you, how do ranges that have IDPA get by with allowing open carry. Would this not fall under the same restrictions?
No. It would fall under this law.
PC §46.15. NONAPPLICABILITY.
(7)(b) *[as added by Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., HB 1815.] Section 46.02 (Unlawful Carrying Weapon) does not
apply to a person who:
(1) is in the actual discharge of official duties as a member of the
armed forces or state military forces as defined by Section 431.001,
Government Code, or as a guard employed by a penal institution;
(2) is traveling;
(3) is engaging in lawful hunting, fishing, or other sporting activity
on the immediate premises where the activity is conducted, or is en
route between the premises and the actor's residence or motor
vehicle, if the weapon is a type commonly used in the activity;
So you can carry open at any range.
If you don't stand for something, then you will fall for anything.

Image
jrosto
Senior Member
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Arlington
Contact:

Post by jrosto »

This is Texas.

BBQ is considered a "sporting activity" in Texas.

A proper BBQ rig is "commonly used in the activity". So as long as you are not carrying some plastic gun, you are good to go :cool:

(hopefully everyone realizes that this is as it should be, not as it is)
"No arsenal or no weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women." Ronald Reagan
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Post by casingpoint »

It just says traveling and does not specify the mode of conveyance, so the exception to applicability could apply to travel by, say, motorboat, bicycle, skateboard, or bipedal motion, right?
KBCraig
Banned
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

Post by KBCraig »

casingpoint wrote:It just says traveling and does not specify the mode of conveyance, so the exception to applicability could apply to travel by, say, motorboat, bicycle, skateboard, or bipedal motion, right?
Reminds me of the (alleged) ruling by Roy Bean: "If he's standing still, he's not carrying. If he's moving, he's traveling. Dismissed!"
Kalrog
Senior Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Leander, TX
Contact:

Post by Kalrog »

KBCraig wrote:Reminds me of the (alleged) ruling by Roy Bean: "If he's standing still, he's not carrying. If he's moving, he's traveling. Dismissed!"
I like that!
casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Post by casingpoint »

Anyone have the link to the new official definition of traveling in Texas?
Renegade

Post by Renegade »

casingpoint wrote:Anyone have the link to the new official definition of traveling in Texas?
There isn't one.

It is still undefined in the Penal code. What they did was change the UCW to not include certain carrying by non CHLs as offense. Here is a link to the bill:

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... ill=HB1815
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”