Carrying ammunition

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
Doug.38PR
Senior Member
Posts: 644
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:36 pm
Location: Northeast, Louisiana C.S.A.

Carrying ammunition

Post by Doug.38PR »

I was told that while guns are off limits to certain places (courthouses, schools etc.) ammunition is perfectly legal that there was no law against carrying around ammunition.

HOWEVER the courthouse here in Marshall has a sign that says no explosives and ammo has been denied entry into the courthouse.

Is there a law that specifically bans ammo from public places or do signs have to be posted. I'd hate to be found with my dump pouch on or speedloaders in my pocket and told I am now in violation of the law
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Post by WildBill »

Doug -
I don't have an answer on this one, but I sure am interested if someone else does. It's something I never thought about - carrying concealed ammo!
NRA Endowment Member
txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Post by txinvestigator »

Generally ammo is not retricted by law. Certainly not like handguns. However, if a place posts a "no ammo" sign and you attempt to gain entry with ammo you could be charged with Criminal Trespass.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Post by WildBill »

txinvestigator wrote:Generally ammo is not retricted by law. Certainly not like handguns. However, if a place posts a "no ammo" sign and you attempt to gain entry with ammo you could be charged with Criminal Trespass.
So, if you are a CHL carrying a loaded handgun and went into a place that had a "ghostbuster" sign and a "no ammo" sign you could be charged for criminal trespass for the ammo, but not the gun?
NRA Endowment Member
lrb111
Senior Member
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Odessa

Post by lrb111 »

Is that a federal court?
Ø resist

Take away the second first, and the first is gone in a second.

NRA Life Member, TSRA, chl instructor
User avatar
KC5AV
Senior Member
Posts: 2122
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: Marshall

Post by KC5AV »

There is a Federal court here.
NRA lifetime member
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Post by WildBill »

Would it matter if it was a Federal court versus State?
NRA Endowment Member
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5321
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Post by srothstein »

Wildbill,

It would matter because federal courts are not covered by the state laws. Our laws are very specific on where a government can ban CHL's.

This is an interesting question and I hope it doesn't go far. There is no law that I know of concerning the carrying of ammo or the banning of it. I would have to think a criminal trespass charge would stick if there was a no ammunition sign and you carried in. Well, at least good enough for a trip to jail. It would be an interesting court case to argue that it was an end run around the legislature's desires on 30.06. I think an appeals court would probably uphold the intent of 30.06, but it could go either way.

The current state of the wording of the law says a person can ban for any reason other than a CHL with a handgun (and obviously no illegal prejudice).
Steve Rothstein
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”