
Thank God Hillary and Obama are going to ban .22 mags!

Still seeking Krink, Noveske complete lower, or Dragunov if someone has a lead on those.


saiga 12 gauge
Norinco sks
Norinco SKSon russian birch
ruger 22"
Yugo AK underfolder
Sub-2000 .40SW
Moderator: carlson1
Cheapest I found was here, and they only charged about 11 bucks for UPS. Gun was 299.00fenster wrote:re: kel-tec sub 2000, where did you get it? was there another? I've been looking for one. especially in .40.
Thanks for that lead..shootthesheet wrote:http://www.centerfiresystems.com/ for a DRAGUNOV that is $849.99.
In my opinion, Beretta really screwed up the marketing of the CX4.asleepatthereel wrote:This is the CX4 I bought. Sorry, dont have any pics handy. I got it at ProDefense in Webster for 575.00. They have it in 9mm and .40SW as well, and I cant remember the price, but its cheaper than Academy. Last time I was there, they had about a half dozen on the wall.
The 9mm version uses the same magazines as the M9/P92FS. The .40 uses the same mag as the PX4 if Im not mistaken. I would have gone with the .40 for more capacity, but I have a weakness for all things .45
Dare I assume you mean a long gun? I got my AR in 9mm because the mag size is easier for me to manipulate, it is the same caliber as my carry pistol, and I can shoot it at ranges that won't allow rifle calibers.B3XD wrote:Sorry to hijack thread, but why buy a semi-auto in a pistol caliber? What advantage is there to it?
Well..technically this would be a carbine. I think it is a comfortable size, the handgun ammo is cheap compared to rifle ammo, it is designed for around 25 yards, it uses mags that I already own for my glock, and most importantly, the gun looks pretty cool and evil!B3XD wrote:Sorry to hijack thread, but why buy a semi-auto in a pistol caliber? What advantage is there to it?