TexasCHLforum.com

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the D.C. gun ban tomorrow, June 26.

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/dc/2008/ ... id=topnews

Process of elimination?

boomerang wrote:Process of elimination?

Well, yes, and they announced they would release it tomorrow, google scotus blog and you'll find an up to the minute report of it, faster than probably any news station.

Interesting blog on who might write the majority opinion on DC vs Heller

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archi ... .html#more

Wow, there going to be a lot of or today. Well probably both, depending on your perspective. I just hope they dont rule to narrowly. Its about time the supremes ruled on the 2nd. Cant wait.

Frost wrote:Wow, there going to be a lot of or today. Well probably both, depending on your perspective. I just hope they dont rule to narrowly. Its about time the supremes ruled on the 2nd. Cant wait.

Expect a narrow ruling although we might be pleasantly surprised. This case is only about whether a ban on possessing a functional firearm in the home is constitutional according to the Second Amendment.

There are a couple of threads here discussing this in some detail already, e.g., this one:

Heller ruling out of SCOTUS today?
http://www.texasshooting.com/TexasCHL_F ... 86&t=16816

10 AM Eastern.

Best single site for the facts of the case:
http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=DC_v._Heller

"Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security and where gun violence is a serious problem

Well 5-4 was enough to win I wish it would have been 9-0. The quote above was by someone on crack, can you believe this bufous

Bill wrote:"Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security and where gun violence is a serious problem

Well 5-4 was enough to win I wish it would have been 9-0. The quote above was by someone on crack, can you believe this bufous

That crackhead was Antonin Scalia. Look at the rest of his statement.

"Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem," Justice Scalia wrote. "That is perhaps debatable, but what is not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct."

you are right, I guess i meant the statement in general used by the media and liberal left, my apologies to justice Scalia

That was Scalia being sarcastic, just like he was being snarky when he cited one of Ginsburg's opinions that seemed to conflict with her dissent.

I think the sarcasm and snarkiness were both appropriate.