Glock settles trademark suit with ISSC

[OldCannon]

Not sure if any of you folks have seen (or shot) the M22, but for a 22 pistol, it seems like an awesome setup for Glock owners (especially if you can't attach the Advantage Arms slide - they don't currently work with Gen4 pistols). Unfortunately, they were too Glock-like for Glock's taste, so ISSC has agreed to go back and fix things (http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/16/gloc ... t-lawsuit/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;).

Personally, I've heard good and bad about them. Most problems seemed to be with the earliest versions and with non hi-velocity ammo. Curious if anybody else has shot one of these.

[trig]

Kind of odd that Glock one.

Sure, it bears a resemblance, but there are several features on that thing that I wish my Glock had.

How does XD get away with it if these guys can't?

[OldCannon]

How does XD get away with it if these guys can't?

I don't own an M22 yet, but I've owned a few XDs/XDMs. Not once have I felt like an XD is a Glock clone. Not in fit (very different grip angle and grip texture), function (XDs are single action pistols), or reliability.

[Keith]

Sorry to get off subject. I have to agree I own a XD45 and a Glock 20. Guns feel and look different. Its funny because when I first had the XD it felt really big and blocky. Now that I have a Glock 20 the XD feels small. Love both guns just different.