Hate to rehash the Post Office thing but...

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Hate to rehash the Post Office thing but...

Post by kauboy »

What do you guys think of this article.?
He makes some very valid points and I for one can't find anything wrong with it. And yes, I did read the actual law and not just take his word for it. Please follow the links he provides so that you can see the laws themselves too.

It would seem that the Federal law supports a lawful CHL holders ability to carry in a post office. :grin:

Any comments???
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Re: Hate to rehash the Post Office thing but...

Post by txinvestigator »

kauboy wrote:What do you guys think of this article.?
He makes some very valid points and I for one can't find anything wrong with it. And yes, I did read the actual law and not just take his word for it. Please follow the links he provides so that you can see the laws themselves too.

It would seem that the Federal law supports a lawful CHL holders ability to carry in a post office. :grin:

Any comments???
And the worms crawl out of that bag; :grin:

This has been discussed here a lot. Run a search for some interesting reading.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Post by kauboy »

I'm really just looking for personal opinion on this particular article. I've done the reading and have seen lots of interpretations, but this seems to leave the interpretation to the exact law.
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
User avatar
Roger Howard
Senior Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: Texas City, TX

Post by Roger Howard »

Yes, the law say's "lawful purpose" but there has not been a case to set precident. some carry there, some don't.
If guns kill people, then I can blame mispelled words on my pencil

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
User avatar
stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

Post by stevie_d_64 »

If I recall...

Is it that little subsection (d) that gets you???

thats where the "lawful purposes" is isn't it???

I don't much worry about this anymore...

I can count on one hand how many times I've been to the PO in the last 6-7 years...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
User avatar
GlockenHammer
Senior Member
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 1:17 pm

Post by GlockenHammer »

I'm sure one of the attorneys on this forum will respond, but it basically comes down to this...there has never been a test case on this point. The author of the article might be right. He might be wrong. Would you like to be the test case?

Here's my fear. The Feds know/think they can't make your rap stick, but they can cause you untold dollars in legal fees before they drop the case. All of that is said and done and you have still not set a precedent for anyone else since your case did not proceed far enough.

They hold all of the cards. My plan is to not piss them off and support the NRA as best I can.
casselthief
Banned
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: yes, I have one.

Post by casselthief »

my opinion: why chance it. you're not going to get held up at a P.O.
I mean, you should be worried more about the postal workers shootin' the place up than joe shmoe. I mean, with all the cameras, guards, and stuff like that, I wouldn't worry too much.

besides, don't say nuttin' about takin' yer pepper spray keychain, right?

or you could just throw your shoe!!! :lol:
"Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the gun..."
kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Post by kauboy »

casselthief wrote:I mean, you should be worried more about the postal workers shootin' the place up than joe shmoe.
Uh, I don't want this happening either. :shock: It would only seem logical to be able to defend myself from all possible threats, shmoe or otherwise. Thats why I'm getting the CHL in the first place.
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
casselthief
Banned
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: yes, I have one.

Post by casselthief »

I feel ya.
I'm just saying, there are alternatives for those special cases.
"Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the gun..."
kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Post by kauboy »

I hear ya, but I'm not sure I'd want to take a chance with my pepper spray against their gun, but thats just me.
Last edited by kauboy on Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
User avatar
carlson1
Moderator
Posts: 11865
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Post by carlson1 »

Alternative is to make sure you keep it concealed.
Image
kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Post by kauboy »

Bingo ;-)
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
casselthief
Banned
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: yes, I have one.

Post by casselthief »

carlson1 wrote:Alternative is to make sure you keep it concealed.
sure. keep it concealed until that guy comes busting in and you blow a hole throw his cerebellum.
then how concealed will it be?

I trust me, I hear you on this. Heck, I'd sleep with my head on the damn thing if the holster was a little more comfy, but there are certain situations you have to look at and say, "you know, I really don't think this is a situation that I need to carry."

and you know, hey, if you feel adament (read as: paranoid) about it, go ahead. I can't say I blame you.
let me relate this quick story, and then I'll leave it be.

I work at a hospital, and a guy comes walkin' in cafeteria while I'm munching down on some tastey viddles. as this guy walks by, he's scratching his back (or some such nonsense) and accidentally ejects the magazine from his pistol. that thing landed with a metallic clank, and everyone in the cafeteria turned and looked.
I, myself, laughed, but it goes to show, even accidentally you can "reveal" your hidden secret.
now I'm sure no one here is that paranoid, nor that clumsy as to drop a loaded magazine, but still, you get the point.
"Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the gun..."
kauboy
Senior Member
Posts: 846
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:15 pm
Location: Burleson, Lone Star State (of course)

Post by kauboy »

Well luckily in Texas that wouldn't matter for squat. A mag falling to the floor is not "intentionally failing to conceal". You are only called on to conceal the gun itself. I know, to some, it could become abruptly apparent that you have a gun if this happened in a post office, but as stated in the article, its apparently legal. Just keep the gun hidden. ;-)
"People should not be afraid of their Governments.
Governments should be afraid of their people." - V
casselthief
Banned
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:05 pm
Location: yes, I have one.

Post by casselthief »

good times. thanks for the update.

I'm still gonna throw my shoe, though.... :razz:
"Good, Bad, I'm the guy with the gun..."
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”