New "Disarm 'em" Policy for DPS troopers ???
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:13 am
Below is admittedly a "lazy-way" paste from another forum (http://www.thehighroad.org) and my reply, but I'm curious to learn if any of you guys (especially other instructors) have heard anything out of DPS in this regard.
----------------
Quote: "That being said, I have heard from a lawyer buddy that DPS had started instructing them to disarm all CHL holders when stopped."
Hmmmm ... Since-the-beginning TX CHL instructor here. And yes, that could now be the case, although it was not discussed in our last renewal school.
In the past, I recall the typical stop involved the trooper simply asking where the handgun was, then generally just leaving it there.
Coming back from an elk hunt in Colorado late last October, a young (solo) DPS trooper lit me up while running a little over 70 in a 65. Mudded-up 4X4 pickup with hunting gear and 2 concealed animals. 1:20 a.m. in the middle-of-no-where on Hwy 287 in TX panhandle (near Quanah). Hardly any other traffic on the road at that hour, so he likely had nothing else to do ... And needed a documented "contact" ? ...
When I handed DL and CHL to him he asked whereabouts at which point I told him of revolver under the floor mat. I was quite surprised when he asked me to hand it to him and asked "Are you sure you want me to reach for it?". He said "Go ahead", so I quite slowly opened the (very much loaded) cylinder before passing off to him over the steering wheel with the muzzle pointed down (at MY knees ...).
He then went back to his vehicle and subsequently returned the snubblie .357 and ammo separately - along with a warning ticket and a polite verbal to "slow it down a little". He asked if he had handled the stop to my satisfaction or if I had any questions.
At that point, I told him (tactfully) that I questioned why he let me reach for the gun, and indicated I had concern over that procedure due to the "action vs. reaction thing" (not wanting to insult his intelligence). He said "Well, you've had the class - and I trust you. But I was ready."
I told him it was the first time in over 10 years that I'd had an LEO touch my carry gun and left it at that. He suggested that I reload the thing promptly, that "If you needed it, it would not do you much good the way I gave it back to you. You guys have a safe trip home."
So yea, there may have been some semi-recent changes in Austin - not necessarily for the better.
----------------------
----------------
Quote: "That being said, I have heard from a lawyer buddy that DPS had started instructing them to disarm all CHL holders when stopped."
Hmmmm ... Since-the-beginning TX CHL instructor here. And yes, that could now be the case, although it was not discussed in our last renewal school.
In the past, I recall the typical stop involved the trooper simply asking where the handgun was, then generally just leaving it there.
Coming back from an elk hunt in Colorado late last October, a young (solo) DPS trooper lit me up while running a little over 70 in a 65. Mudded-up 4X4 pickup with hunting gear and 2 concealed animals. 1:20 a.m. in the middle-of-no-where on Hwy 287 in TX panhandle (near Quanah). Hardly any other traffic on the road at that hour, so he likely had nothing else to do ... And needed a documented "contact" ? ...
When I handed DL and CHL to him he asked whereabouts at which point I told him of revolver under the floor mat. I was quite surprised when he asked me to hand it to him and asked "Are you sure you want me to reach for it?". He said "Go ahead", so I quite slowly opened the (very much loaded) cylinder before passing off to him over the steering wheel with the muzzle pointed down (at MY knees ...).
He then went back to his vehicle and subsequently returned the snubblie .357 and ammo separately - along with a warning ticket and a polite verbal to "slow it down a little". He asked if he had handled the stop to my satisfaction or if I had any questions.
At that point, I told him (tactfully) that I questioned why he let me reach for the gun, and indicated I had concern over that procedure due to the "action vs. reaction thing" (not wanting to insult his intelligence). He said "Well, you've had the class - and I trust you. But I was ready."
I told him it was the first time in over 10 years that I'd had an LEO touch my carry gun and left it at that. He suggested that I reload the thing promptly, that "If you needed it, it would not do you much good the way I gave it back to you. You guys have a safe trip home."
So yea, there may have been some semi-recent changes in Austin - not necessarily for the better.
----------------------