longtooth wrote:Yikes yes. I now need an OWB for the 85. That will put me in shape w/ the roller guns. I would like a Tucker for the 66 but wont spend that kind of money. When I get a GP100 I will probably do it then.
As, seemingly, the lone holder of the JMB memorial and keeper of the Forum flame for 1911 pistols now that Longtooth has completely given over to the Dark side

, please direct your questions to me.
Of interesting note, the latest issue of
Front Sight indicates that recent modifications--or at least proposals--in USPSA rules would mean that IDPA CDP regulations and USPSA Single Stack regulations would essentially merge. You got a single-stack 1911 with iron sights, an 8-round mag, and no compensator or other tricks, you're good to go in either discipline.
The only real difference I can see between the two standards at first glance is that the USPSA allows a 43 ounce gun where IDPA allows only 41 ounces. So presumably you could use a tungsten guide rod and lead tape on the frame in USPSA. The "box" dimensions are identical.
This convergence is a very good thing for 1911 shooters. I couldn't be happier.
However, the USPSA power factor requirement is pretty weak. But that's just my humble opinion. If you use factory loads, you're always at a big disadvantage. The power factor should be raised to reflect standard 230 gr. FMJ loads. Even the weakest 230 load I've shot
well exceeds the USPSA minimum requirement.
LT: Just kidding. But you know that.
You have been and always will be our Most Esteemed Guru of the 1911 (
MEG1).
