Page 1 of 3
1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:29 am
by FishInTx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfJj90eNIfE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Have a Great Day!!!
ADDED: Some adult language.....

Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:43 am
by baldeagle
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:52 am
by G.A. Heath
Bleh, I've seen this fanboy's videos before. He quotes Musashi about a warrior not having a favorite weapon but his previous video was all guns should be Glocks ....
He claims to be a trainer with tons of experience from Military and Law Enforcement positions that has taught 15,000 students who have fired 15,000,000 rounds yet I believe that it was him or his school that had a cameraman between targets while students were shooting. If you have a pistol that works for you who cares who's roll mark is on the slide? BTW, the M1911 originally had a flat mainspring housing it was the M1911A1 that came with the arched version.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:59 am
by jimlongley
I tried to post a reply, apparently they are blocked.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:47 am
by glbedd53
All I can speak for is my own experience. I can believe that on average maybe Glocks are more reliable than 1911s. At least out of the box. My experience has been the opposite. If I had to pick a handgun for reliability from the ones I own it would be a Sig. I only have two guns that have never had a "malfunction", and they are both Sigs.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:51 am
by 68Charger
I understand your opinion, but I just don't understand the shirt or the 11 year old language use. It just irks me.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:02 pm
by MoJo
????? What a tool.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:03 pm
by WildBill
MoJo wrote:????? What a tool.
Not a tool, a bag of nails.

Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:13 pm
by WildBill
glbedd53 wrote:All I can speak for is my own experience. I can believe that on average maybe Glocks are more reliable than 1911s. At least out of the box. My experience has been the opposite. If I had to pick a handgun for reliability from the ones I own it would be a Sig. I only have two guns that have never had a "malfunction", and they are both Sigs.
My Sig P239 has been extremely reliable. In fact, my gun is in pristine condition except for the scratch on the slide from a class where we had to simulate clearing a failure to feed.

Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:54 pm
by DocV
WildBill wrote:
My Sig P239 has been extremely reliable. In fact, my gun is in pristine condition except for the scratch on the slide from a class where he had to simulate clearing a failure to feed.

he?
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:57 pm
by WildBill
DocV wrote:WildBill wrote:
My Sig P239 has been extremely reliable. In fact, my gun is in pristine condition except for the scratch on the slide from a class where he had to simulate clearing a failure to feed.

he?
we [the entire class]
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:08 pm
by tomtexan
How did it get scratched WildBill?
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:12 pm
by WildBill
tomtexan wrote:How did it get scratched WildBill?
Clearing a "stovepipe". It's really not that bad, but it was like getting the first scratch on a new car.

Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:39 pm
by CEOofEVIL
Yeager is probably the one trainer who I absolutely can't stand. Thusly, his mouth moves and all I hear is the Charlie Brown "blah blah blah" noise.
Re: 1911's *stink*
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 2:02 pm
by recaffeination
Some of the responses prove his point about ego tied up in equipment choices.