Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by APynckel »

It is a new tax, originating in the senate.

Article 1 Section 7

Game set match.
NRA Lifetime Member
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by Dave2 »

APynckel wrote:It is a new tax, originating in the senate.

Article 1 Section 7

Game set match.
Obamacare came from the Senate, and it was ruled constitutional specifically on the grounds that it was a tax (even though Obama says it isn't).
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by APynckel »

Dave2 wrote:
APynckel wrote:It is a new tax, originating in the senate.

Article 1 Section 7

Game set match.
Obamacare came from the Senate, and it was ruled constitutional specifically on the grounds that it was a tax (even though Obama says it isn't).
And there are new challenges about originality.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...
Yah think?
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by APynckel »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...
Yah think?
Yes, but I am attacking it from more angles.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar
Slowplay
Senior Member
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:52 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by Slowplay »

APynckel wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
APynckel wrote:It is a new tax, originating in the senate.

Article 1 Section 7

Game set match.
Obamacare came from the Senate, and it was ruled constitutional specifically on the grounds that it was a tax (even though Obama says it isn't).
And there are new challenges about originality.
I'm not sure how far that will go. The Senate took a Bill that had already passed in the House (Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009) to use as a carrier for their health care takeover legislation (PPACA). Bill Summary & Status 111th Congress (2009 - 2010) H.R.3590 will show what they did.

The Senate would do the same in this case - just take a revenue bill passed in the House and dump in what they want.
NRA Benefactor Member
"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance..."
- John Philpot Curran
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by JALLEN »

Who would ever know!? It seems that nobody actually reads these things anymore.

In the old days, I imagine that some Congressmen couldn't read, or barely. Now, they don't.

A man who doesn't read has no advantage over a man who can't!
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
DocV
Senior Member
Posts: 1127
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:29 pm

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by DocV »

JALLEN wrote:Who would ever know!? It seems that nobody actually reads these things anymore.

In the old days, I imagine that some Congressmen couldn't read, or barely. Now, they don't.

A man who doesn't read has no advantage over a man who can't!
"But we have to pass the bill so that you can - uh - find out what is in it."
Nancy Pelosi

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To[/youtube]
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by Dave2 »

DocV wrote:
JALLEN wrote:Who would ever know!? It seems that nobody actually reads these things anymore.

In the old days, I imagine that some Congressmen couldn't read, or barely. Now, they don't.

A man who doesn't read has no advantage over a man who can't!

"But we have to pass the bill so that you can - uh - find out what is in it."
Nancy Pelosi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To
:mad5 I remember when that gem hit the nightly news, and I still have trouble believing she said it with a straight face.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by anygunanywhere »

APynckel wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...
Yah think?
Yes, but I am attacking it from more angles.
Let us know how that unconstitutional thing works out. It has not worked so well of late.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by jimlongley »

Of course it's unconstitutional, but what they are counting on is the long process before it hits SCOTUS plus the long process there. Then there is the (possible) delay in implementation of a decision against them, and they will have another similar bill waiting in the wings to be introduced immediately and start the same process over. If you don't believe it, look at DC and Chicago post Heller and McDonald, where Heller was denied registration of his semi-auto pistol in DC because it was defined as a "machine gun" and Chicago just stacked on extra rules for those attempting to obtain the impossible, a permit to own a gun in Chicago.

It's the way they think. In a thread on FaceBook I was accused of being "obtuse" because i insisted on specific terminology being accurate, while my "opponent" was allowed to claim that the Clackamas Mall shooter committing suicide when confronted by a CHL holder was an indicator that guns cause suicide.

And remember also that Paul Helmke claimed that McDonald was a victory for the Brady Bunch.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
recaffeination

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by recaffeination »

Sure it's unconstituational. So what? Nine out of ten federal laws are unconstitutional, along with the majority of federal spending.

The federal government has become the feral gummint and it didn't start with BHO.
Andrew

Re: Feinstein's bill is Unconstitutional...

Post by Andrew »

:iagree: Andy C's post highlights one of the reasons my Bride and I made the decision to home school our children.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”