Army kills new carbine

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply
User avatar
Moby
Senior Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:41 pm
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Army kills new carbine

Post by Moby »

http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/14/a ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Army has half a million M4 carbines, the lightweight version of the Vietnam-vintage M16. So if the service was going to invest in a replacement, it wanted a “leap ahead” that would, among other things, cut in half the number of times the weapon jammed – a criterion the Army has not made clear until today. None of the eight designs offered for the Individual Carbine competition met that standard, Army officials said, so the service is going to stick with the M4 indefinitely.
Be without fear in the face of your enemies.
Stand brave and upright that the Lord may love thee.
Speak the truth always even if it means your death.
Protect the helpless and do no wrong!

Image
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by AEA »

Makes me wonder if the Army Issued M4's have chrome lined barrels or not? Or if they even considered that as a factor in their tests?
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
gthaustex
Senior Member
Posts: 1318
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by gthaustex »

Moby wrote:http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/14/a ... latestnews

The Army has half a million M4 carbines, the lightweight version of the Vietnam-vintage M16. So if the service was going to invest in a replacement, it wanted a “leap ahead” that would, among other things, cut in half the number of times the weapon jammed – a criterion the Army has not made clear until today. None of the eight designs offered for the Individual Carbine competition met that standard, Army officials said, so the service is going to stick with the M4 indefinitely.
One would think that the criteria for selection / passing their tests should have been clear from the beginning of the program.......
bagman45
Banned
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:20 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by bagman45 »

Sequester at work here. It's likely the Army HAD to have a specific reason to kill the trial, or would have had to pay the participants even MORE for the failed project.
User avatar
psijac
Senior Member
Posts: 1045
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:08 am

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by psijac »

There is some politicing we are not seeing here
Ostrowski emphasized: “The Army is not cancelling the IC competition, the Army is the position where it must conclude the IC competition.”

That may sound like a distinction without a difference. Legally, however, there’s all the different in the world, especially since there is legislative language in the House Armed Services Committee version of the annual defense bill saying “The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual carbine” (emphasis mine). Even though the statute, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, is months from final passing into law, the Army doesn’t want to flout the will of Congress too directly.
07/25/09 - CHL class completed
07/31/09 - Received Pin/Packet sent.
09/23/09 - Plastic in hand!!
User avatar
gigag04
Senior Member
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by gigag04 »

Shooter in the photo needs to get his/her elbow down before it gets shot off
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar
Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Army kills new carbine

Post by Purplehood »

gigag04 wrote:Shooter in the photo needs to get his/her elbow down before it gets shot off
I don't get it...
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”