http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/14/a ... latestnews" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Army has half a million M4 carbines, the lightweight version of the Vietnam-vintage M16. So if the service was going to invest in a replacement, it wanted a “leap ahead” that would, among other things, cut in half the number of times the weapon jammed – a criterion the Army has not made clear until today. None of the eight designs offered for the Individual Carbine competition met that standard, Army officials said, so the service is going to stick with the M4 indefinitely.
Army kills new carbine
Moderator: carlson1
Re: Army kills new carbine
Makes me wonder if the Army Issued M4's have chrome lined barrels or not? Or if they even considered that as a factor in their tests?
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Re: Army kills new carbine
One would think that the criteria for selection / passing their tests should have been clear from the beginning of the program.......Moby wrote:http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/14/a ... latestnews
The Army has half a million M4 carbines, the lightweight version of the Vietnam-vintage M16. So if the service was going to invest in a replacement, it wanted a “leap ahead” that would, among other things, cut in half the number of times the weapon jammed – a criterion the Army has not made clear until today. None of the eight designs offered for the Individual Carbine competition met that standard, Army officials said, so the service is going to stick with the M4 indefinitely.
Re: Army kills new carbine
Sequester at work here. It's likely the Army HAD to have a specific reason to kill the trial, or would have had to pay the participants even MORE for the failed project.
Re: Army kills new carbine
There is some politicing we are not seeing here
Ostrowski emphasized: “The Army is not cancelling the IC competition, the Army is the position where it must conclude the IC competition.”
That may sound like a distinction without a difference. Legally, however, there’s all the different in the world, especially since there is legislative language in the House Armed Services Committee version of the annual defense bill saying “The Secretary of the Army may not cancel the individual carbine” (emphasis mine). Even though the statute, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, is months from final passing into law, the Army doesn’t want to flout the will of Congress too directly.
07/25/09 - CHL class completed
07/31/09 - Received Pin/Packet sent.
09/23/09 - Plastic in hand!!
07/31/09 - Received Pin/Packet sent.
09/23/09 - Plastic in hand!!
Re: Army kills new carbine
Shooter in the photo needs to get his/her elbow down before it gets shot off
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
- Purplehood
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: Army kills new carbine
I don't get it...gigag04 wrote:Shooter in the photo needs to get his/her elbow down before it gets shot off
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07