New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
philip964
Senior Member
Posts: 18490
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by philip964 »

http://www.wwltv.com/story/news/nation- ... /77947384/

The Houston Galleria has been closed once, that I am aware of due to unruly crowds. All the really fancy stores have moved to a new Shopping District across the loop 610 that does not have a mall here in Houston. Many malls nationwide now have rules about unaccompanied minors.

And these are the malls that have survived. Many are now closed for good.

An entire real estate trend born and died during my lifetime.

Supposedly the rioting is fueled by social media.
FastCarry
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 3:16 pm

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by FastCarry »

Damn millenials have lost the meaning and understanding of respect.
striker55
Senior Member
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Katy, TX

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by striker55 »

They blocked people from entering stores in downtown Chicago on black Friday, the police stood by and no one got arrested.
MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by MechAg94 »

Which is the new trend? Closing the mall or rioting in the mall?

And are we talking about protests or riots? Protesting in a private place is generally not legal, but I bet police won't arrest anyone. Rioting is a whole order of magnitude worse and I would expect any local business to close if rioting is occuring outside.
Redneck_Buddha
Senior Member
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:35 pm
Location: Little Elm, TX

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by Redneck_Buddha »

I'm more concerned about protesters interrupting my Sunday brunch at the Four Seasons. #brunchlivesmatter
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by anygunanywhere »

I see. Property rights are supreme if you want to restrict firearm carry, but if someone protests especially on issues of so-called social justice property rights mean squat.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar
Jago668
Senior Member
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: New trend: Closing a mall due to rioting

Post by Jago668 »

anygunanywhere wrote:I see. Property rights are supreme if you want to restrict firearm carry, but if someone protests especially on issues of so-called social justice property rights mean squat.
Personally I think property rights should be supreme. As long as what you are doing isn't negatively affecting people off your property. I don't mean some noise or the like from someone running a tractor. If you are pouring chemicals into a river, or the air then you are hurting property and people for potentially hundreds of miles away from you. Other than stuff like that go for it. As far as trespassing. If you tell them to leave and they refuse, then you call the police and the police won't remove them. Then I think you should be able to shoot them. It is real easy, don't want to get shot then get off their property when they tell you to leave. I'm probably in the minority on that though.
NRA Benefactor Member
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”